You.com
Web search APIs for AI agents
Quick Verdict
3.6/5
Rating
1
Reviews
freemium
Pricing
Web search APIs for AI agents
You.com sells web search, content extraction and grounded answer APIs for AI agents and LLMs. Its consumer AI search assistant still exists but now sits behind a sign-in, and the company leads with the API product.
Where You.com sits
You.com is a company mid-pivot, and any honest review has to start there. What most readers remember — a consumer AI search assistant competing with Perplexity, with model choice and task modes — still exists, but it now sits behind a sign-in and behind a subscription structure that has changed repeatedly. The company's public face today is the API business: web search, content extraction, research, and grounded-answer endpoints sold to developers building AI agents. At time of writing, the pricing page leads with Web Search API Pricing, and the consumer product is a secondary page. If you are cataloging AI tools, You.com in 2026 is best evaluated as infrastructure with a consumer remnant, not as a search engine with an API bolt-on.
That framing matters for the numbers. As of my checks, the Web Search API costs $5.00 per 1,000 calls regardless of how many results you request (up to 100 per call), the Contents API costs $1.00 per 1,000 pages, and the Answer API — a single-call search-and-synthesis endpoint returning citation-grounded answers — is $5.00 per 1,000 calls. A Research API launched on March 3, 2026 with usage pricing that the company has since left unchanged. New accounts get $100 in free credits with no credit card, and there is a keyless MCP profile allowing 100 queries per day. For the consumer side, Pro has settled around $15 per month billed annually ($180/year) against a $20 monthly list price, with a Max plan above it that includes the Advanced Research & Insights features.
What it actually does
The API layer is the substance. A single POST to the search endpoint returns ranked web and news results as JSON, with LLM-ready snippets, rich metadata, and country, language, and freshness filters. One call can return up to 100 results, and each result can carry full page content — search and extraction in one request. The Contents API exists separately for when you already have URLs and just need clean Markdown or raw HTML. The Answer API does the synthesis step for you: it retrieves, then generates an answer grounded only in retrieved passages with citations attached, which is aimed at teams that want a RAG-style answer without running their own retrieval stack. Default self-serve rate limits are 10 requests per second; Python and TypeScript SDKs, a hosted MCP server, and machine-payment options (USDC per call) round out the developer surface. Enterprise adds custom QPS, ZDR, SOC 2, and dedicated support.
The consumer assistant, where it still operates, offers multiple frontier models (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google), agent modes (Auto, Compute, Research), custom agent creation, and the privacy-leaning positioning You.com has always claimed. The free consumer tier as it once existed is gone: an official support notice states the unlimited free plan ended and users were moved to a 25-query trial of Pro.
My testing notes
Observation one: the pricing per call is the most transparent in this corner of the market, and I checked the math against the docs. A Web Search call returning 100 results costs the same as one returning 10, and the flat rate applies regardless. Where costs can climb is the extraction add-on: full-page content at $1.00 per 1,000 pages counts only pages crawled live, and the extraction_source parameter decides how many those are — cache mode never crawls, blend (the default) serves cached pages free and crawls the rest, fetch crawls everything. In my trial calls, blend kept live-crawl counts low on common URLs and higher on obscure ones. For a 100,000-call monthly workload the difference between cache and fetch is the difference between $500 and up to $2,500 — worth configuring deliberately.
Observation two: latency was the strongest signal. The vendor advertises p50 around 0.4 seconds for search, and an enterprise customer quote claims a cut from over five seconds to sub-one-second p50 with three-nines success rates. My own trial calls returned well under a second each on simple queries, which is consistent with the published figure. For agent loops where search sits inside a chain of tool calls, that latency profile is the reason to pick this over a scraping stack you assemble yourself.
Observation three: the consumer pivot is real and abrupt. The support article ending the unlimited free plan is dated and explicit — twenty-five trial queries, then access ends unless you pay. When I revisited the consumer side, the sign-in wall and the plan changes made the experience feel like a product being wound down politely rather than grown. The pros in our catalog entry for this tool (multiple AI models, code mode) describe a product that no longer leads; the API is what the company stands behind now, and the resources blog is where the engineering substance lives.
Limits
If what you want is a consumer search assistant, the honest answer is that Perplexity offers a more coherent free experience and Google has distribution You.com cannot match. The consumer free tier is effectively gone, Pro pricing has moved twice, and the team plan was replaced by a higher-priced Max tier. The assistant remains competent — model choice and agent modes are real features — but you would be buying into a product line the vendor itself de-emphasizes.
On the API side, the limits are mostly standard: self-serve rate limits of 10 rps, per-call billing that rewards result-count generosity but meters live crawling, and the fact that the Answer API's 93.48% SimpleQA accuracy is a vendor-reported benchmark figure I could not independently verify. Machine payments via USDC have no zero-data-retention guarantee on keyless requests, per the vendor's own resource page — relevant if you are wiring agents to pay their own way. And the rapid pricing changes (Contents API dropped from $10 to $1 per 1,000 pages) cut in your favor today but signal that the price list is not yet settled.
How I would deploy it
In an agent pipeline, the configuration choices matter more than the headline price. My default for retrieval-inside-a-tool-loop is snippets only, count around 10 to 20, blend extraction off entirely — the model in the loop rarely needs full page text, and every live crawl you trigger is billed. When a step genuinely needs document contents (say, extracting terms from a specific pricing page), I switch that one call to the Contents API with URLs I already hold, which at $1 per 1,000 pages is cheaper than paying for live crawls through search. For user-facing answers where I want a synthesized response with citations and do not want to run my own generation step, the Answer API at the same $5 per 1,000 calls as plain search is the efficient pick — you are effectively getting the synthesis layer for free relative to doing retrieval plus generation yourself. That is my working recommendation: search for control, contents for known URLs, answers for user-facing synthesis, and cache-mode extraction unless you have a specific reason to crawl. Budget-wise this shapes up well against assembling a scraping and search stack by hand, once you count the engineering time you are not spending.
Verdict
I rate You.com 3.6 out of 5: strong on core functionality depth for the API product — search, extraction, and grounded answers at published prices with SDKs and MCP support — and good on value at current rates, offset by a consumer experience in decline, an unsettled price history, and a benchmark claim I cannot independently check. For developers grounding AI agents who want one vendor for search plus extraction plus answer synthesis with predictable per-call costs, this is a credible, well-priced choice at time of writing. For someone who wants a privacy-respecting AI search engine to use daily, the product has moved on, and I would say so plainly rather than review the thing that used to be there.
Sources
- https://you.com/pricing
- https://you.com/upgrade
- https://you.com/resources/lower-search-api-cost
- https://you.com/resources/you-com-web-search-api
- https://support.you.com/kb/s/article/Changes-to-You-com-s-Free-plan
- https://support.you.com/kb/s/topic/0TOVq000000HjaDOAS/plans-pricing
- https://support.you.com/kb/s/article/Managing-your-Pro-subscription
- https://www.usagepricing.com/blueprint/you-com
- https://about.you.com/resources/lower-search-api-cost
Pros
- Flat $5/1k calls for up to 100 results per search call — one price regardless of result count, with page content included (at time of writing)
- Trial calls returned well under a second each, consistent with the published p50 of ~0.4s — the strongest latency signal in this market segment
- $100 in free credits with no card plus a keyless MCP profile at 100 queries/day makes prototyping genuinely free
- Contents API at $1/1k pages (down from $10) is the cheapest clean page extraction I have priced out
- SOC 2, ZDR options, DPA, and CCPA posture are documented on the pricing page — rare at this price point
Cons
- The consumer assistant is a de-emphasized remnant: unlimited free tier ended, users pushed into a 25-query Pro trial per the vendor's own support notice
- Consumer pricing has churned — Team plan replaced by a higher-priced Max tier, Pro settled at $15/month annual against a $20 list
- Full-page extraction costs can multiply unpredictably: up to $2,500 per 100k calls with fetch mode vs $500 with cache
- The 93.48% SimpleQA figure for the Answer API is a vendor benchmark I could not independently verify
- Keyless machine-payment requests carry no zero-data-retention guarantee, per the vendor's own docs
Best For
Developers grounding AI agents who want predictable per-call pricing for search, extraction, and citation-backed answers from one vendor.
Compare with alternatives:
Reviews (0)
No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!
Articles about You.com
Alternatives to You.com
NotebookLM
Turn documents into interactive AI-powered study guides and summaries
Readwise Reader
All-in-one reading and note-taking hub with AI-powered insights.
WolframAlpha
Computational intelligence for expert answers and insights
Frequently Asked Questions
What is You.com?
You.com sells web search, content extraction and grounded answer APIs for AI agents and LLMs. Its consumer AI search assistant still exists but now sits behind a sign-in, and the company leads with the API product.
Is You.com free?
You.com has a free tier with limits. Paid plans unlock more usage and features. See pricing above for the current plans.
Who is You.com for?
Developers grounding AI agents who want predictable per-call pricing for search, extraction, and citation-backed answers from one vendor.
What are the main benefits of You.com?
Flat $5/1k calls for up to 100 results per search call — one price regardless of result count, with page content included (at time of writing). Trial calls returned well under a second each, consistent with the published p50 of ~0.4s — the strongest latency signal in this market segment. $100 in free credits with no card plus a keyless MCP profile at 100 queries/day makes prototyping genuinely free.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.