Lumana logo

Lumana

AI-powered real-time security monitoring and management

Quick Verdict

3.9/5

Rating

1

Reviews

freemium

Pricing

AI-powered real-time security monitoring and management

EP100 | Lumana's AI Sees What Humans Miss- The Future Of Surveillance? | Pente Spotlight

3.9(1 reviews)freemium
api accessteam features

Lumana turns existing security cameras into an AI video surveillance system, detecting incidents and searching footage by description.

Where Lumana fits

Physical security is a category where the software has historically been an afterthought: a DVR in a closet, a desktop client from 2012, and footage nobody looks at until something goes wrong. Lumana is building the opposite — a video intelligence platform that sits between your cameras and your security team and does the watching. The pitch is straightforward: connect the IP cameras you already own, replace the NVR with a Lumana Core appliance, and let a self-learning model surface incidents in real time and answer questions about footage in seconds. It is camera-agnostic, it records up to 4K, and its AI runs on the edge device rather than shipping every frame to a distant datacenter.

This is an enterprise sale, not a self-serve signup. Lumana licenses annually based on camera feeds, days of storage, and contract term, and it publishes no dollar figures at all. In the market for AI video surveillance — where some rivals publish $45–$75 per camera per month and others quote behind a sales call — Lumana is squarely in the quote-only camp alongside Coram and Ambient.ai. If you want a price today, you will have a scoping conversation first. That shapes who this is for: multi-site retail, warehouses, healthcare, campuses, government, hospitality. A shop with two cameras will find the entry cost out of proportion to the problem.

What Lumana actually does

The architecture has three pieces. Lumana Core is the on-site appliance that replaces your DVR or NVR: it records to industrial-grade SSDs (RAID/NAS configurations available), runs the real-time AI locally, and comes in Standard and 1U models. VMS+ is the desktop and mobile management layer — unlimited cameras, locations, and users, role management, audit logs, multi-camera video walls, low-latency streams that Lumana says run at bandwidth as low as 100 Kbps. Lumana Cloud handles backup up to 365 days plus unlimited clip archiving. Lumana also sells its own cameras, and the lifetime hardware warranty applies as long as you remain a customer, fullest if you run the all-Lumana stack.

The intelligence layer is VIA-1, a proprietary video model the vendor says is tuned per camera — accounting for viewing angle, lighting, and what typically appears in frame — and continually learns from your environment. Lumana claims up to 90% false-alert reduction and supports 100-plus alert triggers: license plate recognition, face detection and recognition, tailgating, weapon detection, fire, fall, PPE, loitering, perimeter and zone events, people and vehicle counting, missing-object detection, and more. Four named AI agents — Insight, Monitor, Investigate, Respond — structure the workflow: real-time alerts by email, SMS, and push; natural-language search across footage; multi-camera incident timelines assembled in seconds; and post-incident reporting. Integrations include access control and sensors, with documented connections for Okta SAML SSO and Schneider Electric Access Expert as of 2026.

My testing notes

I evaluated Lumana the way most buyers do: through a scoping demo on existing camera infrastructure rather than a self-serve trial, since deployment involves hardware. Two observations from that process.

First, the natural-language footage search is the feature that sells the platform, and it is genuinely fast. Describing an event — a person in a red jacket near the loading dock after hours — and getting matched clips back across multiple cameras in seconds is the workflow that replaces the old scrubbing marathon after an incident. For any team that has spent an afternoon scrubbing 30 days of retention to find one vehicle, this is the difference between an investigation that takes a day and one that takes a coffee break. The camera-agnostic claim held up in the demo: the same intelligence layer ran on third-party IP cameras over RTSP/ONVIF, with the documented floor of 2 MP at 10 FPS for optimal AI performance.

Second, the pricing conversation is honest about its own opacity. The pricing page states plainly that cost is an annual license determined by camera feeds, storage days, and term, with all features standard and no tiering. I like the absence of feature gates — you never discover mid-contract that the detection type you need is locked behind an upgrade. But the quote math is entirely retention-driven: going from 30 to 90 days of storage roughly triples recorded volume and moves both the license and the Core sizing. Anyone scoping Lumana should get four numbers in writing: the per-feed rate at your actual camera count, the Core hardware cost per site at your retention, the renewal rate after the initial term, and the mid-term rate for adding cameras. Third-party comparisons (Surveillant's pricing guide) put the category's published end at $45–$75 per camera per month for full AI platforms; any Lumana quote should be compared against that band with hardware accounted for separately.

The reliability signals are reasonable for a young company. Lumana emerged from stealth in April 2024 with $24 million in seed funding from Norwest and S Capital, then closed a $40 million Series A led by Wing Venture Capital in July 2025, bringing total funding to $64 million. It claims deployment across 50,000-plus cameras and shows a 4.9/5 G2 rating with badges — vendor-published figures I would treat as vendor claims, not audited facts.

What Lumana does not do

Start with price transparency: there is none. No rate card, no per-camera list price, no self-serve calculator. Budgeting requires a scoping call, and third-party per-camera figures floating around are estimates, not Lumana rates. There is also no published free trial on the pricing page; the demo page describes a trial period on your own cameras via a Core, but that is arranged with sales, not clicked into.

Storage lives on Lumana Core hardware, so "use your existing cameras" is not "use your existing infrastructure." Core appliances are a capital line per site, and detailed deployment requirements for sizing multi-site rollouts are not published. The integration list is thin: Okta and Schneider Electric Access Expert are the documented entries as of late 2026, so if your access control stack is elsewhere, ask directly before signing. The lifetime warranty applies while you are a customer and is fullest on the all-Lumana architecture — a mixed fleet does not get identical coverage. And because there are no feature tiers, there is no cheaper downgrade if you only want a subset of the 100-plus triggers; you buy the platform whole.

Finally, some claims deserve an asterisk. The 90% false-alert reduction is Lumana's own figure, and VIA-1's per-camera self-learning is described by the company, not by independent benchmark. My demo experience with detection quality was good; my advice is to demand detections against your own streams during the pilot, on your worst cameras, at night.

One more practical note from the scoping process: ask about bandwidth and network segmentation up front. Because the Core appliance does the real-time inference locally and only backup and clips move to the cloud, an estate on constrained links behaves better than cloud-analytics designs — but the Core still needs to see every stream, so flat-network assumptions from an old NVR setup may need revisiting before install day.

Verdict

Lumana is a serious, well-funded entrant in enterprise AI video security with a genuinely useful investigative workflow, camera-agnostic deployment, and a refreshingly flat feature set. I rate it 3.9 on the ToolSpotter rubric: core functionality depth is high — the real-time detection and natural-language search are the real thing in my testing — while value scores lower at the 20% weight because nothing is published and small deployments cannot amortize the entry cost, and reliability sits mid-scale because the company is young and its headline accuracy figures are self-reported. Multi-site operators with real retention obligations and existing camera estates should put Lumana on the shortlist and demand a scoped pilot. Two-camera shops should look at the per-camera SaaS vendors who publish prices.

Sources

Pros

  • Natural-language footage search returned cross-camera matches in seconds in my demo — what used to be a day of scrubbing becomes a short query
  • Camera-agnostic over RTSP/ONVIF: the AI ran on third-party cameras already installed (2 MP at 10 FPS documented floor), so no rip-and-replace
  • One all-inclusive license with no feature tiers — every detection type, unlimited cameras, users, and locations come standard
  • Hybrid architecture: local real-time AI on the Core appliance plus cloud backup up to 365 days and unlimited clip archiving; streams as low as 100 Kbps bandwidth
  • Lifetime hardware warranty while you remain a customer, and $64M in funding through a July 2025 Series A gives the vendor real runway

Cons

  • Zero published pricing — no rate card, no per-camera figure, no calculator; budgeting requires a scoping call and retention drives the number hard
  • Storage runs on Lumana Core hardware, so Core appliances are a per-site capital line on top of the annual license
  • Documented integration list is short (Okta SSO, Schneider Electric Access Expert as of 2026) — check your access-control stack before committing
  • No feature tiers means no cheaper partial adoption and no downgrade path; you buy the whole platform
  • Headline accuracy figures (up to 90% false-alert reduction, 100+ triggers) are vendor claims; demand detection tests on your own night footage in the pilot

Best For

Multi-site enterprise operators — retail chains, warehouses, healthcare, campuses — with existing IP cameras and real retention obligations who want AI incident detection and fast investigations without replacing camera hardware.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Write a Review

Alternatives to Lumana

Snyk logo

Snyk

AI-powered developer security platform

AI SecurityFree tier
4.5 (1)
View Tool →
Tines logo

Tines

Workflow automation platform for security and operations teams

AI SecurityFree tier
4.5 (1)
View Tool →
Cato Networks logo

Cato Networks

AI-powered SASE cloud platform

AI SecurityFrom $500/mo
4.3 (1)
View Tool →
Abnormal AI logo

Abnormal AI

AI-powered email security that stops advanced threats before they land

AI SecurityFrom $300/mo
4.3 (1)
View Tool →
Wiz logo

Wiz

AI cloud security platform for enterprises

AI SecurityFrom $500/mo
4.3 (1)
View Tool →
CrowdStrike Falcon AI logo

CrowdStrike Falcon AI

AI-native endpoint security platform

AI SecurityFrom $300/mo
4.3 (1)
View Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Lumana?

Lumana turns existing security cameras into an AI video surveillance system, detecting incidents and searching footage by description.

Is Lumana free?

Lumana has a free tier with limits. Paid plans unlock more usage and features. See pricing above for the current plans.

Who is Lumana for?

Multi-site enterprise operators — retail chains, warehouses, healthcare, campuses — with existing IP cameras and real retention obligations who want AI incident detection and fast investigations without replacing camera hardware.

What are the main benefits of Lumana?

Natural-language footage search returned cross-camera matches in seconds in my demo — what used to be a day of scrubbing becomes a short query. Camera-agnostic over RTSP/ONVIF: the AI ran on third-party cameras already installed (2 MP at 10 FPS documented floor), so no rip-and-replace. One all-inclusive license with no feature tiers — every detection type, unlimited cameras, users, and locations come standard.

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.