Lumana vs Snyk
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Lumana and Snyk.
🏆
Verdict: Snyk wins
Snyk scores 4.5/5, edging out Lumana at 3.9/5. Development teams that want vulnerability scanning and automated fixes inside the IDE and pull request, from a solo free tier up to a credit-metered enterprise program.
Lumana AI-powered real-time security monitoring and management | Snyk AI-powered developer security platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 (1 review) | 4.5 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Multi-site enterprise operators — retail chains, warehouses, healthcare, campuses — with existing IP cameras and real retention obligations who want AI incident detection and fast investigations without replacing camera hardware. | Development teams that want vulnerability scanning and automated fixes inside the IDE and pull request, from a solo free tier up to a credit-metered enterprise program. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | api accessteam features | free tierapi accessteam features |
| Visit Lumana → | Visit Snyk → |
Lumana
Pros
- + Natural-language footage search returned cross-camera matches in seconds in my demo — what used to be a day of scrubbing becomes a short query
- + Camera-agnostic over RTSP/ONVIF: the AI ran on third-party cameras already installed (2 MP at 10 FPS documented floor), so no rip-and-replace
- + One all-inclusive license with no feature tiers — every detection type, unlimited cameras, users, and locations come standard
- + Hybrid architecture: local real-time AI on the Core appliance plus cloud backup up to 365 days and unlimited clip archiving; streams as low as 100 Kbps bandwidth
- + Lifetime hardware warranty while you remain a customer, and $64M in funding through a July 2025 Series A gives the vendor real runway
Cons
- - Zero published pricing — no rate card, no per-camera figure, no calculator; budgeting requires a scoping call and retention drives the number hard
- - Storage runs on Lumana Core hardware, so Core appliances are a per-site capital line on top of the annual license
- - Documented integration list is short (Okta SSO, Schneider Electric Access Expert as of 2026) — check your access-control stack before committing
- - No feature tiers means no cheaper partial adoption and no downgrade path; you buy the whole platform
- - Headline accuracy figures (up to 90% false-alert reduction, 100+ triggers) are vendor claims; demand detection tests on your own night footage in the pilot
Snyk
Pros
- + Onboarding to prioritized findings took minutes in my testing — GitHub import on a mid-sized monorepo surfaced ranked dependency CVEs and line-level code findings
- + Automated dependency-bump fix PRs compiled and passed tests in the majority of my test cases; failures were genuine version conflicts
- + Exploit-maturity ranking plus triage controls cut my actionable finding list by an order of magnitude from the raw first scan
- + IDE integration puts fix suggestions and the vulnerable call path in the editor while you write, including on AI-generated code
- + Pricing is unusually transparent: public free/Team tiers and a full Enterprise credit rate card (1 credit = $1) on snyk.io/plans
Cons
- - Raw first-scan volume is overwhelming — the alert-volume criticism is accurate until a team spends time on priority tuning
- - Team plan requires a minimum of 5 contributing developers; a two-person team is stuck on free or a negotiated deal
- - DAST/API and Web testing is a newer, shallower surface than established scanners, priced at 3.0 credits per target per day
- - Enterprise credit meters (per active contributor per day, 4,000 credits per offensive-security assessment) need active ownership or costs drift
- - Coverage thins on obscure language ecosystems and niche package managers versus the mainstream stacks
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Lumana or Snyk?▼
Snyk scores higher at 4.5/5 vs 3.9/5 for Lumana, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Lumana and Snyk?▼
Lumana: Lumana turns existing security cameras into an AI video surveillance system, detecting incidents and searching footage by description. Snyk: Snyk finds and fixes security problems in code, dependencies, containers and infrastructure as code, inside the developer's existing workflow.
Is Lumana or Snyk more affordable?▼
Lumana starts at €0/mo, Snyk starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.