Lumana vs Tines
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Lumana and Tines.
🏆
Verdict: Tines wins
Tines scores 4.5/5, edging out Lumana at 3.9/5. Security, IT and operations teams that need auditable no-code automation across sensitive systems with human approval gates built in.
Lumana AI-powered real-time security monitoring and management | Tines Workflow automation platform for security and operations teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 (1 review) | 4.5 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Multi-site enterprise operators — retail chains, warehouses, healthcare, campuses — with existing IP cameras and real retention obligations who want AI incident detection and fast investigations without replacing camera hardware. | Security, IT and operations teams that need auditable no-code automation across sensitive systems with human approval gates built in. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | api accessteam features | free tierteam featuresapi access |
| Visit Lumana → | Visit Tines → |
Lumana
Pros
- + Natural-language footage search returned cross-camera matches in seconds in my demo — what used to be a day of scrubbing becomes a short query
- + Camera-agnostic over RTSP/ONVIF: the AI ran on third-party cameras already installed (2 MP at 10 FPS documented floor), so no rip-and-replace
- + One all-inclusive license with no feature tiers — every detection type, unlimited cameras, users, and locations come standard
- + Hybrid architecture: local real-time AI on the Core appliance plus cloud backup up to 365 days and unlimited clip archiving; streams as low as 100 Kbps bandwidth
- + Lifetime hardware warranty while you remain a customer, and $64M in funding through a July 2025 Series A gives the vendor real runway
Cons
- - Zero published pricing — no rate card, no per-camera figure, no calculator; budgeting requires a scoping call and retention drives the number hard
- - Storage runs on Lumana Core hardware, so Core appliances are a per-site capital line on top of the annual license
- - Documented integration list is short (Okta SSO, Schneider Electric Access Expert as of 2026) — check your access-control stack before committing
- - No feature tiers means no cheaper partial adoption and no downgrade path; you buy the whole platform
- - Headline accuracy figures (up to 90% false-alert reduction, 100+ triggers) are vendor claims; demand detection tests on your own night footage in the pilot
Tines
Pros
- + Security-native design: credential isolation, immutable audit logs, SSO on the free tier and first-class approval gates — I verified approvals work as a primitive, not a webhook hack
- + A real phishing-response workflow (enrich, branch, Slack approval, ticket write-back) went live on the canvas in under an hour in my testing
- + G2 satisfaction is exceptional for the category: 4.8/5 from ~230 reviews with high-nineties scores on ease of use, setup and support quality
- + Vendor-agnostic by design — anything with an API connects, so you are not stranded by a curated connector marketplace
- + Strong company signals: $125M Series C at a $1.125B valuation (Feb 2025), 1B+ automated actions per week, and an AI-governance (3B) story ahead of rivals
Cons
- - No published pricing above the free tier — every production evaluation runs through sales, and the AWS Marketplace vehicle is a custom contract only
- - The free edition caps at 3 live workflows (and 25,000 monthly events under older terms) — enough to evaluate, not to operate
- - No code escape hatch: deep JSON reshaping and bespoke logic get tedious in event transforms where a JS node would be three lines
- - Tines 3B (self-healing, cross-org monitoring of externally built workflows) launched July 2026 and is young — validate hands-on before betting a governance program on it
- - Category identity is blurred (SOAR, iPaaS, process automation), and non-security use cases feel secondary to the alert-driven core
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Lumana or Tines?▼
Tines scores higher at 4.5/5 vs 3.9/5 for Lumana, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Lumana and Tines?▼
Lumana: Lumana turns existing security cameras into an AI video surveillance system, detecting incidents and searching footage by description. Tines: Tines is a workflow automation platform used by security and IT teams to build and run processes across sensitive systems without writing code.
Is Lumana or Tines more affordable?▼
Lumana starts at €0/mo, Tines starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.