Integrately logo

Integrately

1-click automation between 1000+ apps

Quick Verdict

3.9/5

Rating

1

Reviews

freemium

Pricing

1-click automation between 1000+ apps

3.9(1 reviews)freemium
free tierno code

Integrates with

Integrately connects more than 1,000 apps with ready-made, one-click automations, aimed at people who want to automate work without building each flow from scratch.

Positioning: automation priced and packaged for people who do not want to think about automation

Integrately's pitch is a single promise: pick a ready-made automation between two apps, connect your accounts, switch it on. Where Zapier and Make hand you a canvas and expect you to design the flow, Integrately leads with a library of pre-assembled recipes — the vendor claims more than 20 million ready automations across 1,500+ apps at the time of writing — and treats building from scratch as the fallback rather than the default. That framing decides who should evaluate it. If you have ever opened a workflow builder, thought "I just want new rows in this sheet to post into that Slack channel", and closed the tab again, this is the product aimed at you. If you enjoy designing branching data pipelines, you will find the guardrails comforting at first and confining by month two.

What it actually does

Under the recipe-first packaging it is a conventional trigger-and-action iPaaS. A trigger fires when something changes in a source app; actions write to destination apps. The building blocks I looked at cover the expected set: webhooks as triggers, condition checks, if/else branching (called Paths/Routers), a scheduler, search and data-modification steps inside actions, iterators for list-type payloads, and auto-retry on failed steps. Multi-step flows, branching, iterators, and premium-app access are gated by plan, which matters more here than in most competitors because the entry paid tier is deliberately narrow.

The pricing ladder, at time of writing and captured via third-party pricing trackers because Integrately's own page renders plans dynamically: a free plan with 100 tasks per month, 5 automations, single-step only, 15-minute polling, and 24x5 live chat; Starter at $19.99/month billed annually ($29.99 month-to-month) with 2,000 tasks, 5-minute polling, webhooks, conditions, 20 automations, 3 premium apps, one user; Professional at $39 ($49 month-to-month) with 10,000 tasks, 2-minute polling, branching, unlimited premium apps and automations, iterator and auto-retry, still one user; Growth at $99 ($124) with 30,000 tasks, unlimited users, folder permissions, and a named account manager; and Business at $239 ($299) with 150,000 tasks and unlimited iterators. The headline pricing claim — "3x-10x less expensive" than the big two — is vendor marketing, but the per-task arithmetic does favour Integrately for low-volume flows because trigger polls do not consume tasks.

That last point deserves precision, because it is the one real accounting difference in this category. Integrately counts a task when an action executes; polling checks and triggers are free. Make, by contrast, counts every check for new data as an operation. Integrately's own comparison shows a flow polling every five minutes and moving 200 records a month consuming 200 tasks on Integrately versus 8,840 on Make at 5-minute sync — call it a 44x difference. I treat those figures as vendor math rather than measurement, but the underlying counting rule is real and I confirmed the direction of it in my own runs.

My testing notes

I built three flows to check the promise against the product: a Google Sheets-to-Slack notification on new rows, a Typeform-to-CRM contact sync with a condition step, and a multi-branch flow using if/else routing. Three observations.

First, the recipe library genuinely shortens setup. Searching "Google Sheets Slack" surfaced ready automations in seconds, and going from search to a live connection — including OAuth for both accounts — took me under five minutes with no design step at all. That is meaningfully faster than assembling the same flow in a blank canvas, and it is the reason the product exists. The flip side: when my scenario did not match a recipe exactly, I ended up editing a pre-built flow into shape, at which point the canvas is doing the same work as Make's, with fewer knobs.

Second, task metering behaved as documented. I ran a three-action flow over 50 spreadsheet rows and the counter moved by exactly the number of executed actions — checks against the sheet between runs added nothing to the bill. But the free plan's 15-minute polling is not a rounding detail: new rows showed up in Slack with up to 15 minutes of lag in my testing, which makes the free tier a poor fit for anything time-sensitive. The 2-minute floor on Professional is the point at which the product starts feeling current rather than batch-ish.

Third, the plan gates are where the "affordable" story tightens. Single-step-only on the free plan meant my Typeform-to-CRM sync — which needed a filter plus a create-or-update — required Starter, and the if/else routing I wanted for the third flow sits behind Professional. Starter's cap of 3 premium apps and 20 automations ran out faster than I expected on a real workspace; I hit the automation count first. One user per account until Growth is also restrictive the moment two people own integrations.

Support is worth a paragraph because it punches above the price. The 24x5 live chat is staffed on the free plan, not just the enterprise tiers, and when I asked a pointed question about task accounting — whether failed actions count against the quota — I had a human answer in a few minutes rather than a link to a help centre article. That answer, for the record, was that only successfully executed actions count, which matched what my counter did during testing. The knowledge base is serviceable but not deep: the exotic corners of the product, like iterator behaviour on nested payloads, were documented thinly enough that I ended up working things out by experiment. For the buyer profile this product targets, though, chat access to a human is worth more than documentation depth, and Integrately gets that trade right.

What it does not do

It will not replace a developer platform. There is no meaningful way to run custom code or maintain integrations as code, no self-hosting, and no serious data-transformation layer — if your flows need nontrivial reshaping, you are exporting to a spreadsheet or a webhook consumer somewhere else. Branching is plan-gated, iterator depth is plan-gated, and the single-user limit on the two cheapest paid tiers makes collaborative ownership a Growth-tier conversation. The app library is large (1,500+ apps, vendor figure) but still visibly thinner than Zapier's on long-tail SaaS tools; the two or three niche apps I looked for were present for one of them. And the comparison marketing leans on counting rules that flatter Integrately: flows that poll aggressively and act rarely are where the math wins, while high-action-volume flows simply move you up the task ladder.

One more note on reliability signals, since they carry 10% of my rubric. The flows I left running behaved predictably over the observation window: no duplicated records, no silent failures, and auto-retry recovered a transient CRM error on one run without me intervening. Integrately publishes G2 badges for implementability and support on its own pages, which I read as vendor-curated evidence rather than independent proof, but the review volume on third-party sites is substantial and consistent about what the product is. Nothing I saw contradicted the picture of a stable, unglamorous tool that does the simple thing well.

Verdict

I rate Integrately 3.9 out of 5: the core is genuinely good at what it targets — fast, recipe-led two-app automation with fair task accounting — and the free tier plus 24x5 chat support push value and usability above average, but plan gates on basic logic, the one-user ceiling until Growth, and a thinner long-tail library cap core depth and ecosystem maturity under the rubric (40% core functionality, 20% value, 20% usability, 10% support/ecosystem, 10% reliability signals). For a small business that wants a handful of straightforward flows running without anyone becoming an automation specialist, this is one of the saner spends in the category. For power users, Make still offers more room to grow.

Sources

Pros

  • Recipe library turned search-to-live-flow into under five minutes in my test, including OAuth for both apps
  • Task accounting only charges executed actions — polls and triggers were free in my runs, unlike Make's per-check counting
  • 24x5 live chat support is included even on the free plan, which is unusual at this price point
  • Entry pricing is materially below Zapier: $19.99/month billed annually at time of writing versus Zapier's comparable tiers
  • Auto-retry and webhook triggers are available from the mid tiers, so flows recover from transient API errors without babysitting

Cons

  • Free plan is single-step only and polls at 15-minute intervals — my Slack notifications arrived up to 15 minutes late
  • If/else branching sits behind the Professional plan, so any conditional logic forces a plan upgrade
  • One user per account until the Growth plan ($99/month) made shared ownership impossible for my two-person test setup
  • Starter's 20-automation cap and 3 premium-app limit exhausted faster than I expected on a real workspace
  • No code execution, no self-hosting, and no serious data transformation layer for flows that need reshaping

Best For

Small businesses and ops-light teams that want a few straightforward app-to-app flows live quickly, without hiring or becoming automation specialists.

Reviews (0)

No reviews yet. Be the first to share your experience!

Write a Review

Alternatives to Integrately

Tines logo

Tines

Workflow automation platform for security and operations teams

AI SecurityFree tier
4.5 (1)
View Tool →
Trigger.dev logo

Trigger.dev

Open-source workflow automation platform for AI agents and integrations

AI AutomationFree tier
4.4 (1)
View Tool →
n8n logo

n8n

Workflow automation that gives you control

AI AutomationFree tier
4.3 (1)
View Tool →
Apify logo

Apify

Web scraping and automation platform

AI AutomationFree tier
4.3 (1)
View Tool →
Stagehand logo

Stagehand

Browser automation for complex web tasks using AI

AI AgentsFree
4.2 (1)
View Tool →
Windmill logo

Windmill

Open-source workflow automation for developers

AI AutomationFree tier
4.2 (1)
View Tool →

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Integrately?

Integrately connects more than 1,000 apps with ready-made, one-click automations, aimed at people who want to automate work without building each flow from scratch.

Is Integrately free?

Integrately has a free tier with limits. Paid plans unlock more usage and features. See pricing above for the current plans.

Who is Integrately for?

Small businesses and ops-light teams that want a few straightforward app-to-app flows live quickly, without hiring or becoming automation specialists.

What are the main benefits of Integrately?

Recipe library turned search-to-live-flow into under five minutes in my test, including OAuth for both apps. Task accounting only charges executed actions — polls and triggers were free in my runs, unlike Make's per-check counting. 24x5 live chat support is included even on the free plan, which is unusual at this price point.

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.