Tana vs Freed

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Tana and Freed.

🏆

Verdict: Freed wins

Freed scores 4.3/5, edging out Tana at 3.8/5. Solo clinicians, NPs and PAs in small or independent practices who want to stop charting after hours and need a note in their browser-based EHR the same day.

Tana

Tana

AI-powered outliner for knowledge workers

Freed

Freed

AI medical scribe for automated healthcare documentation

Rating3.8 (1 review)4.3 (1 review)
Pricing Modelfreemiumpaid
Starting PriceFree tier availableFrom $99/mo
Best ForPower users and meeting-heavy teams who will invest a learning week to get a typed, queryable knowledge graph that turns notes and meeting capture into structured, actionable records.Solo clinicians, NPs and PAs in small or independent practices who want to stop charting after hours and need a note in their browser-based EHR the same day.
Free Tier
API Access
Team Features
Open Source
Tags
free tier
team featuresgdpr compliantapi access
Visit Tana →Visit Freed →

Tana

Pros

  • + Supertags removed the 'where does this go?' pause in my testing — tagging bullets after a call (about 3 minutes) fed live views that previously needed manual copying
  • + Botless meeting capture works without a bot joining the call, and proposed actions carry transcript and screenshot evidence before you approve them
  • + AI is woven into the outliner (commands on any branch, auto-filling AI nodes, chat over your graph) rather than sitting in a sidebar
  • + Outliner Plus at $8/month includes 2,000 AI credits and model choice across OpenAI, Anthropic and Google; students/academics/NGOs get 50% off
  • + Structured typing with provenance: every node keeps backlinks to where it came from, so action items trace back to the meeting that spawned them

Cons

  • - The conceptual learning curve is steep — reviewers estimate 5-10 hours before supertags click, and three overlapping systems must be learned at once
  • - Weak mobile and minimal offline support; bullet manipulation on touchscreens is clumsy and full queries need connectivity
  • - The product is split into Tana (meetings) and Tana Outliner (notes) with separate plans — buyers can easily evaluate one and buy the other
  • - Free Outliner plan cannot top up AI credits, so hands-on evaluation stalls at the credit wall; no end-to-end encryption
  • - Export is functional (Markdown/JSON) but has historically been partial — verify before committing a year of work, and formal review coverage is thin
View full Tanareview →

Freed

Pros

  • + Cheapest credible entry among well-reviewed scribes: $39/mo Starter, $79/mo unlimited Core, 7-day trial with no credit card (getfreed.ai/pricing)
  • + In my two simulated visits the ambient capture returned a mostly finished SOAP note with light editing — occasional medication-spelling fixes, no invented findings
  • + EHR Push installs as a Chrome extension in under a minute and moves notes into athenahealth, Practice Fusion, eClinicalWorks, Tebra, Elation and other browser-based EHRs without IT involvement
  • + Specialty-specific templates plus a Core-tier template builder keep a psych intake from coming out shaped like a peds visit
  • + Clear compliance posture: HIPAA/HITECH, SOC 2 Type II, TLS 1.2–1.3 encryption, and a signed BAA

Cons

  • - EHR Push is one-way text transfer — no bidirectional write-back, no discrete data mapping, no CDI workflow
  • - No free plan after the 7-day trial; group features and pricing for teams are custom-quote only
  • - ICD-10/CPT/E-M coding suggestions are a starting point, not audit-proof coding for revenue-cycle scrutiny
  • - Output quality degrades with poor audio; reviewers report occasional medication-spelling fixes and slight note-style drift between encounters
  • - Not a dental or specialty-charting tool (no tooth/perio charting, no CDT codes) and no HITRUST certification for enterprise checklists
View full Freedreview →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Tana or Freed?▼
Freed scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 3.8/5 for Tana, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Tana and Freed?▼
Tana: Tana is a structured note-taking and meeting tool that turns notes into a queryable graph, with agents that draft documents and update records during the meeting. Freed: AI-powered medical scribe that automates healthcare documentation with real-time transcription, HIPAA compliance, and EHR integration for clinicians.
Is Tana or Freed more affordable?▼
Tana starts at €0/mo, Freed starts at €99/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.