Notta vs Freed
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Notta and Freed.
🏆
Verdict: Freed wins
Freed scores 4.3/5, edging out Notta at 4.2/5. Solo clinicians, NPs and PAs in small or independent practices who want to stop charting after hours and need a note in their browser-based EHR the same day.
Notta Transform audio to text with AI summaries | Freed AI medical scribe for automated healthcare documentation | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $99/mo |
| Best For | Multilingual teams and individual professionals who record meetings or interviews regularly and want capture, translation, summaries, and exportable deliverables in one subscription. | Solo clinicians, NPs and PAs in small or independent practices who want to stop charting after hours and need a note in their browser-based EHR the same day. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | mobile appapi accessfree tier | team featuresgdpr compliantapi access |
| Visit Notta → | Visit Freed → |
Notta
Pros
- + Bot-free desktop capture records system audio plus microphone with no meeting bot joining Zoom, Teams, Meet, or Slack calls — in my use this removed the consent conversation from client meetings entirely
- + Widest language coverage in the category I test: 58 transcription languages, 23 bilingual live pairs, 80 real-time translation targets
- + Pro annual at $8.17/month for 1,800 minutes works out around $0.0045 per audio minute at time of writing (notta.ai pricing page), cheaper than most rivals
- + Practical export set — TXT, DOCX, PDF, SRT, XLSX — with a clean SRT I dropped straight into a video editor and clickable timestamps in the transcript
- + Documented security posture: SOC 2 Type II and ISO 27001 attestations, plus local offline transcription via Pro Privacy Mode on macOS 13+/Windows 10+
Cons
- - Free plan caps every conversation at 3 minutes, which rules out the main use case for a transcription tool and tests the interface rather than the workflow
- - Real-time translation is a paid add-on from $6/month at time of writing with only 2 free uses a month; bilingual transcription gets 4 free uses
- - Custom vocabulary covers only English and Japanese, so domain terminology in other languages gets no recognition help
- - The 98.86% accuracy figure is a vendor claim under optimal conditions; diarization stumbled on overlapping speakers and heavy accents in my testing and third-party reports
- - Monthly-billing prices disagree between Notta's pricing page and help centre ($13.99 vs $13.49 for Pro) and are hard to find on the site at all
Freed
Pros
- + Cheapest credible entry among well-reviewed scribes: $39/mo Starter, $79/mo unlimited Core, 7-day trial with no credit card (getfreed.ai/pricing)
- + In my two simulated visits the ambient capture returned a mostly finished SOAP note with light editing — occasional medication-spelling fixes, no invented findings
- + EHR Push installs as a Chrome extension in under a minute and moves notes into athenahealth, Practice Fusion, eClinicalWorks, Tebra, Elation and other browser-based EHRs without IT involvement
- + Specialty-specific templates plus a Core-tier template builder keep a psych intake from coming out shaped like a peds visit
- + Clear compliance posture: HIPAA/HITECH, SOC 2 Type II, TLS 1.2–1.3 encryption, and a signed BAA
Cons
- - EHR Push is one-way text transfer — no bidirectional write-back, no discrete data mapping, no CDI workflow
- - No free plan after the 7-day trial; group features and pricing for teams are custom-quote only
- - ICD-10/CPT/E-M coding suggestions are a starting point, not audit-proof coding for revenue-cycle scrutiny
- - Output quality degrades with poor audio; reviewers report occasional medication-spelling fixes and slight note-style drift between encounters
- - Not a dental or specialty-charting tool (no tooth/perio charting, no CDT codes) and no HITRUST certification for enterprise checklists
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Notta or Freed?▼
Freed scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 4.2/5 for Notta, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Notta and Freed?▼
Notta: AI-powered transcription tool that converts audio and video content into accurate text with intelligent summaries across multiple platforms. Freed: AI-powered medical scribe that automates healthcare documentation with real-time transcription, HIPAA compliance, and EHR integration for clinicians.
Is Notta or Freed more affordable?▼
Notta starts at €0/mo, Freed starts at €99/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.