Notta vs Deepgram
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Notta and Deepgram.
🏆
Verdict: Deepgram wins
Deepgram scores 4.2/5, edging out Notta at 4.1/5. Developers and platform teams building voice features — transcription pipelines, live captioning, voice agents — who want public per-minute pricing, real streaming performance and the option to self-host.
Notta Transcribe and summarize meetings and audio in seconds | Deepgram Speech-to-text API with real-time transcription and low latency | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | usage-based |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Pricing varies |
| Best For | Multilingual teams and meeting-heavy professionals who want accurate transcripts, action items and translation in one workspace with broad meeting-platform coverage. | Developers and platform teams building voice features — transcription pipelines, live captioning, voice agents — who want public per-minute pricing, real streaming performance and the option to self-host. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresmobile app | api accessfree tier |
| Visit Notta → | Visit Deepgram → |
Notta
Pros
- + Free tier is genuinely usable for voice memos and short clips: 120 minutes/month with speaker identification, no credit card — though conversations cap at 3 minutes
- + Language coverage is the category's broadest that I have tested: 58 transcription languages, translation into 40+, custom vocabulary for English and Japanese
- + Pro at $8.17/month equivalent (annual) for 1,800 minutes and 5-hour recordings is strong value against Otter and Fireflies at similar price points
- + Meeting capture spans Zoom, Google Meet, Teams and Webex with live transcription, plus Chrome extension, screen recording and 13+ file formats for upload
- + Integration surface is wide: seven CRMs (Salesforce, HubSpot, Pipedrive, Zoho, Zendesk Sell, Salesflare, Freshsales), Notion, Slack, Zapier and five cloud storage services
Cons
- - The vendor's 98.86% accuracy is a clean-audio figure — in my testing, noisy recordings with crosstalk produced concentrated word errors and brief speaker merges
- - Free-tier 3-minute conversation cap reframes 'free meeting notes' as 'free short-clip transcription'; meeting users must go Pro
- - Monthly quotas do not carry over, and even Business caps recordings at 5 hours — all-day sessions need splitting
- - SSO and audit logs are locked to Enterprise, which requires 51+ seats — a high compliance floor for smaller companies
- - AI summary credit systems (10/100/200 per month) and separate Notta Brain credits mean heavy users hit ceilings beyond transcription minutes
Deepgram
Pros
- + Per-second billing with no rounding up — my 47-minute test metered exactly 2,820 seconds against APIs that would have billed 48 or 60 minutes
- + Every self-serve rate is on a public pricing page, including BYO-LLM and BYO-TTS Voice Agent tiers from $0.05/min
- + One-time $200 signup credit with no card and no expiry covers roughly 700 hours of pre-recorded Nova-3 transcription
- + Self-hosted deployment is real and documented, via an official Helm chart covering STT, TTS and the Voice Agent API on Kubernetes
- + Streaming latency held up in testing and matches independent benchmarks (Coval measured Nova-3 at 85 ms mean time to final segment, October 2026)
Cons
- - Streaming prices are promotional with no end date and the regular rates printed alongside are 59-60% higher — budget for $0.0077/min, not $0.0048/min
- - Support is community and Discord only below Enterprise, even on the $4,000+/year Growth plan
- - No recurring free tier: the $200 credit is one-time, and Deepgram measures its coverage against the cheapest configuration
- - No end-user product at all — no editor, dashboard or export tools for non-technical teams
- - Accuracy on accented, noisy or mono audio trails the strongest models; Coval ranks Nova-3 19th of 30 on mixed-sample word error rate
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Notta or Deepgram?▼
Deepgram scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 4.1/5 for Notta, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Notta and Deepgram?▼
Notta: Notta records and transcribes meetings, interviews and audio files and then writes summaries and action items. It can join a call as a bot or record on the device. Deepgram: Deepgram provides speech-to-text, text-to-speech and voice agent APIs for developers, with real-time transcription built for high volumes.
Is Notta or Deepgram more affordable?▼
Notta starts at €0/mo, Deepgram starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.