Nomi Health vs Freed
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Nomi Health and Freed.
🏆
Verdict: Freed wins
Freed scores 4.3/5, edging out Nomi Health at 3.5/5. Solo clinicians, NPs and PAs in small or independent practices who want to stop charting after hours and need a note in their browser-based EHR the same day.
Nomi Health AI-powered virtual care for chronic disease management | Freed AI medical scribe for automated healthcare documentation | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $1000/mo | From $99/mo |
| Best For | Self-funded mid-market and large employers with workforces concentrated in Nomi's network markets (Michigan, Texas, Georgia, Ohio, Florida) who want direct provider contracts, claims-level analytics and a measurable savings methodology. | Solo clinicians, NPs and PAs in small or independent practices who want to stop charting after hours and need a note in their browser-based EHR the same day. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | team features | team featuresgdpr compliantapi access |
| Visit Nomi Health → | Visit Freed → |
Nomi Health
Pros
- + Artemis analytics segments spend by condition, site of care and vendor against the employer's own claims; micro-segmentation produced an actionable 40-person cohort in my walkthrough within a few clicks
- + Savings measured against PPO-equivalent cost on volume actually steered to Network providers — trackable in claims data rather than projected, which is the methodology a CFO can audit
- + Network design removes member cost-sharing entirely ($0 copays, no deductibles) at direct-contracted health systems
- + Payments infrastructure pays providers in days rather than months, reducing rate-shock pricing built into provider contracts
- + Vendor publishes outcome data (Michigan year-one: 30% average savings, 16% fewer ER visits) and puts its direct-contracting thesis in front of Congress rather than only in sales decks
Cons
- - Network coverage is roughly two dozen US markets concentrated in the Midwest and South; national employers get partial coverage at best
- - No published pricing of any kind — the catalog's $1,000 minimum is unsupported by any source I could find
- - Implementation is a benefits-infrastructure project involving TPA, broker and finance; not self-serve
- - The 9% increase in outpatient surgeries in the same vendor data suggests utilization shifting rather than uniformly falling — savings claims need cohort-level scrutiny
- - Payments business (serving TPAs and providers) may shift incentives away from pure plan-savings alignment over time
Freed
Pros
- + Cheapest credible entry among well-reviewed scribes: $39/mo Starter, $79/mo unlimited Core, 7-day trial with no credit card (getfreed.ai/pricing)
- + In my two simulated visits the ambient capture returned a mostly finished SOAP note with light editing — occasional medication-spelling fixes, no invented findings
- + EHR Push installs as a Chrome extension in under a minute and moves notes into athenahealth, Practice Fusion, eClinicalWorks, Tebra, Elation and other browser-based EHRs without IT involvement
- + Specialty-specific templates plus a Core-tier template builder keep a psych intake from coming out shaped like a peds visit
- + Clear compliance posture: HIPAA/HITECH, SOC 2 Type II, TLS 1.2–1.3 encryption, and a signed BAA
Cons
- - EHR Push is one-way text transfer — no bidirectional write-back, no discrete data mapping, no CDI workflow
- - No free plan after the 7-day trial; group features and pricing for teams are custom-quote only
- - ICD-10/CPT/E-M coding suggestions are a starting point, not audit-proof coding for revenue-cycle scrutiny
- - Output quality degrades with poor audio; reviewers report occasional medication-spelling fixes and slight note-style drift between encounters
- - Not a dental or specialty-charting tool (no tooth/perio charting, no CDT codes) and no HITRUST certification for enterprise checklists
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Nomi Health or Freed?▼
Freed scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 3.5/5 for Nomi Health, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Nomi Health and Freed?▼
Nomi Health: Nomi Health is a payments and analytics platform for self-funded employer healthcare, handling direct provider contracts and claims payments. Freed: AI-powered medical scribe that automates healthcare documentation with real-time transcription, HIPAA compliance, and EHR integration for clinicians.
Is Nomi Health or Freed more affordable?▼
Nomi Health starts at €1000/mo, Freed starts at €99/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.