Make AI vs Fillout
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Make AI and Fillout.
🏆
Verdict: Fillout wins
Fillout scores 4.1/5, edging out Make AI at 3.9/5. Small-to-mid teams that want Typeform-grade form design with far cheaper scaling and native two-way sync into Airtable, Notion or Salesforce.
Make AI AI scenarios in Make automation | Fillout Build forms and surveys without code in minutes | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 (1 review) | 4.1 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Existing Make users adding AI steps and agents to their automations, and teams that want credit-priced workflow automation with a native AI layer. | Small-to-mid teams that want Typeform-grade form design with far cheaper scaling and native two-way sync into Airtable, Notion or Salesforce. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierno code | free tierno codeapi access |
| Visit Make AI → | Visit Fillout → |
Make AI
Pros
- + Credit pricing is transparent and cheap at entry: Core is $9/month annual for 10K credits at time of writing (make.com/en/pricing)
- + Maia generated a working scenario from a one-sentence description — faster than building it visually in my test
- + MCP server lets external AI clients call Make scenarios, turning Make into a callable automation layer
- + 3,000+ native apps plus Custom Apps for any public API; routers and error handlers cost zero credits
- + AI Agents (beta, all plans) can use Make's AI Provider or your own LLM key
Cons
- - AI modules routed through Make's AI Provider consumed multiple credits per bundle in my runs — plan credits for the AI path, not the step count
- - Not standalone: everything requires a Make subscription; this is Make's AI layer, not a separate tool
- - Running out of credits stops scenarios entirely until you top up or upgrade
- - Free tier is thin for real work: 2 active scenarios, 15-minute scheduling, 5-minute execution cap
- - AI Agents are still beta and the AI module selection is narrower than dedicated AI platforms
Fillout
Pros
- + Free plan collects 1,000 responses/month with unlimited forms, questions and seats — verified against Typeform's 10/month free cap
- + No per-seat charges on any tier, so billing tracks usage instead of headcount
- + Bidirectional Airtable/Notion mapping with URL-parameter pre-fill and conditional display — form-as-front-end for internal systems
- + Deep free-tier feature set: conditional logic, payments, scheduling, PDF generation, workflows and resume-in-progress submissions
- + Pricing matrix is published server-side with concrete limits (20 MB vs 1 GB file ceilings) rather than hidden behind sales calls
Cons
- - Custom domains require the $75/month Business tier (annual billing) even for teams that need little else
- - Response caps (1,000/2,000/5,000) push you up tiers fast if a form catches traffic; only Business is uncapped
- - Partial submissions — recovery of abandoned entries — are gated to Business, where small teams need them most
- - Address autocomplete, enrichment and SMS/email verification are paid add-ons on top of plan prices
- - Hosted only: no self-hosting or on-prem option for teams with data-residency constraints
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Make AI or Fillout?▼
Fillout scores higher at 4.1/5 vs 3.9/5 for Make AI, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Make AI and Fillout?▼
Make AI: Make's built-in AI capabilities including natural language workflow creation and AI modules for text and image processing. Fillout: Fillout builds forms, surveys and quizzes without code and writes responses into tools such as Airtable, Notion and Salesforce.
Is Make AI or Fillout more affordable?▼
Make AI starts at €0/mo, Fillout starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.