HireVue vs Ashby
A detailed comparison to help you choose between HireVue and Ashby.
🏆
Verdict: Ashby wins
Ashby scores 4.2/5, edging out HireVue at 3.4/5. Tech companies from startup through mid-market that hire continuously and want sourcing, ATS, scheduling and funnel analytics in one system instead of a stitched-together tool stack.
HireVue AI-powered video interviewing and candidate assessment platform | Ashby Applicant tracking and recruiting platform with AI-powered sourcing | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.4 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $150/mo |
| Best For | Large employers screening 500+ candidates per year who need standardized, structured video screening and assessments at scale and have the budget and compliance function to run it properly. | Tech companies from startup through mid-market that hire continuously and want sourcing, ATS, scheduling and funnel analytics in one system instead of a stitched-together tool stack. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | ssoteam features | team featuresssoapi access |
| Visit HireVue → | Visit Ashby → |
HireVue
Pros
- + Structured scorecards and calibration are built into the review workflow — in my walkthrough, multiple reviewers scoring the same response worked without extra tooling
- + Scales the first screen from hundreds to thousands of candidates with the same criteria, which is the core economic case and it holds up
- + Assessment science has moved to validated exercises and game-based assessments; automated facial analysis has been gone since January 2021, which matters for legal defensibility
- + Mature candidate flow: device checks, practice questions, configurable retakes and reminders, and browser-based mobile recording without an app
- + Deep enterprise ATS integrations and two decades of deployment at large employers
Cons
- - No published pricing and no self-serve tier — third-party procurement data puts entry around $35K/year with reported averages near $50K and implementation on top
- - Recorded interviews create candidate anxiety and can bias toward presentation fluency; employers must add retakes, prep time and live alternatives to compensate
- - Not an ATS: it augments your system of record rather than replacing it, so the stack stays two vendors deep
- - Deploying AI-assisted hiring tools now carries compliance overhead (NYC Local Law 144 audits, EU AI Act obligations) that the buyer, not the vendor, ultimately owns
Ashby
Pros
- + Analytics out of the box: stage conversion, source-of-hire and interviewer feedback appeared in dashboards in my test without any report configuration
- + AI features are workflow-native and editable — candidate search filters from plain-language prompts, reviewable AI outreach tokens, and talent rediscovery over past applicants
- + Credit allotments are published per tier (1,500/month Foundations, 2,500/seat/yr Plus, 12,500/seat/yr Enterprise), so AI spend is modelable before you sign
- + Recruiting-ops depth: outreach frequency policies, confidential projects, DNC company lists, audit logs in the API, SSO and SCIM at higher tiers
- + Foundations at $400/month total (up to 100 employees, 10% annual discount) is a flat, predictable entry price
Cons
- - No free tier and a $400/month floor; Plus and Enterprise pricing is quote-only based on company size, usage and commitment
- - Configuration weight is real — teams without recruiting ops should budget setup time for workflows, permissions and reporting
- - SSO costs an extra $100/month on Foundations, custom permission roles are capped at 3 on Plus, and sourcing email lookups meter at 200/month before paid batches
- - It is not an HRIS: no payroll, performance management or post-hire onboarding, so it complements rather than replaces an HR stack
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, HireVue or Ashby?▼
Ashby scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 3.4/5 for HireVue, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between HireVue and Ashby?▼
HireVue: HireVue is a hiring platform for video interviews, skills assessments and automated scheduling, used by large employers to screen candidates at scale. Ashby: Ashby combines applicant tracking, interview scheduling, recruiting CRM and analytics in one system, aimed at teams that want reporting without stitching several tools together.
Is HireVue or Ashby more affordable?▼
HireVue starts at €500/mo, Ashby starts at €150/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.