Freed vs Aidoc
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Freed and Aidoc.
🏆
Verdict: Freed wins
Freed scores 4.3/5, edging out Aidoc at 4.2/5. Solo clinicians, NPs and PAs in small or independent practices who want to stop charting after hours and need a note in their browser-based EHR the same day.
Freed AI medical scribe for automated healthcare documentation | Aidoc AI powered radiology image analysis platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $99/mo | From $10000/mo |
| Best For | Solo clinicians, NPs and PAs in small or independent practices who want to stop charting after hours and need a note in their browser-based EHR the same day. | Hospital radiology departments and integrated health systems with meaningful acute imaging volumes that want one governed platform for many FDA-cleared triage algorithms instead of a stack of point solutions. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | team featuresgdpr compliantapi access | api accessteam featuresgdpr compliant |
| Visit Freed → | Visit Aidoc → |
Freed
Pros
- + Cheapest credible entry among well-reviewed scribes: $39/mo Starter, $79/mo unlimited Core, 7-day trial with no credit card (getfreed.ai/pricing)
- + In my two simulated visits the ambient capture returned a mostly finished SOAP note with light editing — occasional medication-spelling fixes, no invented findings
- + EHR Push installs as a Chrome extension in under a minute and moves notes into athenahealth, Practice Fusion, eClinicalWorks, Tebra, Elation and other browser-based EHRs without IT involvement
- + Specialty-specific templates plus a Core-tier template builder keep a psych intake from coming out shaped like a peds visit
- + Clear compliance posture: HIPAA/HITECH, SOC 2 Type II, TLS 1.2–1.3 encryption, and a signed BAA
Cons
- - EHR Push is one-way text transfer — no bidirectional write-back, no discrete data mapping, no CDI workflow
- - No free plan after the 7-day trial; group features and pricing for teams are custom-quote only
- - ICD-10/CPT/E-M coding suggestions are a starting point, not audit-proof coding for revenue-cycle scrutiny
- - Output quality degrades with poor audio; reviewers report occasional medication-spelling fixes and slight note-style drift between encounters
- - Not a dental or specialty-charting tool (no tooth/perio charting, no CDT codes) and no HITRUST certification for enterprise checklists
Aidoc
Pros
- + Widest FDA-cleared acute triage portfolio I have reviewed: 31 authorisations on the FDA's December 2025 list, plus the first multi-indication clearance covering 14 abdominal CT findings in one workflow
- + Multi-triage consolidation meaningfully reduces alert noise — one flagged study produces one stacked panel, not one pop-up per algorithm
- + Real-world deployment evidence: Mercy Health documented urgent case turnaround falling from 19.8h to 1.3h across 50+ hospitals, with 5,642 patients expedited from 50,749 flagged findings
- + Vendor-neutral aiOS layer lets a health system run third-party and Aidoc algorithms through one governance and notification stack (17 FDA-cleared algorithms deployed at Hartford HealthCare)
- + Care Coordination and Patient Management close the loop beyond triage: mobile alerts with image context, and report mining that routes incidental findings to facility-defined follow-up protocols
Cons
- - No public pricing, no trial, no free tier — third-party estimates of ~$50k/site/year baseline with $8k-$15k per extra module are unverifiable until you are deep in a sales process
- - Hospital-only: requires PACS/RIS/EHR integration work, so it is irrelevant to individual clinicians, small practices and low-volume facilities
- - 510(k) clearance for most modules does not itself require independent clinical performance data (per JAMA Network Open) — buyers should demand the study set, not just the clearance count
- - No public changelog for algorithm updates, which is a real gap for a system whose output feeds clinical decisions
- - Vendor performance figures (order-of-magnitude false-alert reduction, 1,600+ hospitals) are company claims I could not independently audit
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Freed or Aidoc?▼
Freed scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 4.2/5 for Aidoc, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Freed and Aidoc?▼
Freed: AI-powered medical scribe that automates healthcare documentation with real-time transcription, HIPAA compliance, and EHR integration for clinicians. Aidoc: Aidoc analyses medical imaging to flag urgent findings for radiologists and care teams, prioritising the cases that need attention first.
Is Freed or Aidoc more affordable?▼
Freed starts at €99/mo, Aidoc starts at €10000/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.