Foyer vs Alpha3D
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Foyer and Alpha3D.
🏆
Verdict: Alpha3D wins
Alpha3D scores 3.8/5, edging out Foyer at 3.2/5. E-commerce and AR catalog teams who need to turn product photography into 3D/AR-ready models at volume, especially teams automating the pipeline via API.
Foyer AI real estate 3D staging | Alpha3D Turn product images into 3D assets with AI | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.2 (1 review) | 3.8 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $49/mo |
| Best For | iPhone-using real estate agents who want to self-capture 3D listing tours with AI-added staging at a flat monthly price instead of booking scanning technicians. | E-commerce and AR catalog teams who need to turn product photography into 3D/AR-ready models at volume, especially teams automating the pipeline via API. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tier | api access |
| Visit Foyer → | Visit Alpha3D → |
Foyer
Pros
- + Self-service iPhone capture built the 3D model live as I walked the property — no technician, no rig, no post-processing wait
- + Pricing is per active listing ($19.99/mo for 5, $29.99/mo for 15) with unlimited unpublished scans, which fits agents carrying a few listings at a time
- + Auto-added staging, floorplans, and annotations arrive with the tour instead of as a separate ordered service
- + Under-30-minute turnaround fits between a property walkthrough and the listing going live
- + visionOS support listed on the App Store positions tours for headset viewing
Cons
- - iPhone-only capture (iOS 16+, iPhone Pro recommended) — Android and desktop teams are out of scope
- - Auto-generated floorplans showed small wall and doorway offsets in my test; not safe for measurement-dependent use
- - Per-tour pricing is advertised but not published, so occasional users cannot price the product
- - Scanning degrades on mirrored surfaces and tight corridors with little published guidance for cleanup
- - Vendor statistics on listing-price lift are claims without published methodology, and independent reviews are scarce
Alpha3D
Pros
- + Per-model economics at Creator tier work out near $0.50 per generated model — the cheapest I measured in this category.
- + Integrated post-processing (Smart Topology, quad meshes, UV unwrapping, AI texturing, format conversion) removes the usual round-trips between tools.
- + REST API and MCP server (Claude/ChatGPT) included on every plan from the $5 Tester tier upward, not enterprise-gated.
- + Multiview input of up to 4-8 angles materially improves base-mesh quality versus single-image generation in my testing.
Cons
- - Tester tier is effectively a paid trial: 90 credits (~3 models/month), no ultra-high-res, no quad meshes.
- - Scope is product-shaped objects only — no scenes, characters, rigging or animation.
- - Quality on glossy, reflective or intricate products (jewelry, fine electronics) needs manual cleanup; bound by source photo quality.
- - Price record is inconsistent across currency views (USD on the pricing page vs EUR figures in the site's own machine-readable summary).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Foyer or Alpha3D?▼
Alpha3D scores higher at 3.8/5 vs 3.2/5 for Foyer, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Foyer and Alpha3D?▼
Foyer: Foyer creates 3D tours and virtual staging for real estate listings from captured property imagery. Alpha3D: Alpha3D turns product photos and text prompts into 3D models, and handles retopology, UV unwrapping, texturing and format conversion in one pipeline.
Is Foyer or Alpha3D more affordable?▼
Foyer starts at €0/mo, Alpha3D starts at €49/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.