Claap vs Culture Amp
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Claap and Culture Amp.
Claap AI-powered async video for interviews | Culture Amp Employee feedback platform that turns survey data into actionable insights | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 (397 reviews) | 4.8 (300 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From €5/mo |
| Best For | Hiring teams using async video interviews to screen candidates without scheduling calls | Mid-to-large organizations looking to replace annual surveys with continuous listening and drive measurable improvements in employee engagement. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam features | ssoteam features |
| Visit Claap → | Visit Culture Amp → |
Claap
Pros
- + Async video interviews
- + AI meeting summaries
- + Team collaboration on videos
Cons
- - Niche use case
- - Competition from Loom
Culture Amp
Pros
- + Analyze feedback at scale with natural language processing to surface themes automatically
- + Compare engagement metrics across teams, locations, and tenure cohorts
- + Set up pulse surveys quickly to track sentiment changes between formal cycles
- + Integrate with Workday, SuccessFactors, and other HRIS platforms
- + Track action items and accountability to close feedback loops
Cons
- - Requires significant organizational commitment—higher value when employees actually respond to surveys
- - Can feel data-heavy for smaller teams without dedicated people analytics capacity
- - Pricing scales with employee count, making it expensive for large enterprises
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.