Xano vs Softr
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Xano and Softr.
🏆
Verdict: Softr wins
Softr scores 4.1/5, edging out Xano at 4.0/5. Agencies, ops teams and non-technical founders building client portals and internal tools over real data who want AI generation without giving up visual editing.
Xano Build scalable backends without coding | Softr Build web apps and portals without code | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 (1 review) | 4.1 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Technical founders and small dev teams who want a production Postgres backend with compliance certifications, unlimited API calls at a flat rate, and no DevOps hire. | Agencies, ops teams and non-technical founders building client portals and internal tools over real data who want AI generation without giving up visual editing. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierno codeteam featuresapi access | free tierno codeteam features |
| Visit Xano → | Visit Softr → |
Xano
Pros
- + Function Stack debugger steps through every layer of an endpoint with live intermediate values — in my testing this made a role-branching endpoint with an external API call debuggable in minutes
- + Flat-rate API pricing: Essential ($85/mo billed annually, xano.com/pricing at time of writing) includes unlimited API requests, so traffic spikes do not move the bill
- + Production compliance stack on paid plans — SOC 2, ISO 27001/27701/9001/42001, GDPR, HIPAA add-on — without building infra for procurement checklists
- + Developer toolchain parity with code-first backends: XanoScript GA, VS Code extension, CLI, Git sync with branching, sandbox environments
- + Auto-generated OpenAPI docs from the database schema; my test schema produced usable spec output with no extra work
Cons
- - The $29 Starter tier was retired in January 2026, making $85/month the production floor — a 193% jump for teams architected around the old pricing
- - No RAM/CPU usage dashboard despite documented 502s from exhausted instance resources; I saw no way to anticipate a ceiling before hitting it
- - XanoScript and Function Stacks do not port to any standard framework — leaving Xano means rebuilding the entire API logic layer
- - Free plan is a sandbox only: 10 requests/20s rate limit and 100K record cap surfaced immediately in my burst testing
- - Expression editor and admin UI get painful at scale; a 3-year user on r/xano cites unexplained 500s and poor function/table organization
Softr
Pros
- + AI Co-Builder asks follow-up questions on roles and auth before generating a full app — schema, sample data, permissions and pages in minutes
- + Native Softr Databases ends the Airtable dependency: one-click import of relational bases and visibly faster apps on native records
- + Three AI layers (Co-Builder, Ask AI for live data queries, Database AI Agents with model choice and cost preview) are woven into the product, not bolted on
- + Data-source reach is broad: 14 external sources plus REST connector, with queries proxied server-side so credentials never reach browsers
- + Free plan is real (5 app users, 5,000 records, unlimited apps) and manual editing keeps working when AI credits run out
Cons
- - App-user caps drive upgrades faster than builder counts: 10 users on Basic, 60 on Pro, with add-on users at $1-2 each per month
- - AI credits are capped on every tier with no rollover; 50,000 extra credits cost $1,000/year per Softr's own comparison material
- - SQL and BigQuery sources are gated to the $329/month Business plan, which is the real entry point for enterprise data
- - Complex logic beyond the block model needs workarounds or the vibe coding block; pixel-level design control is bounded by the block library
- - Mobile experience is a PWA at Business tier, and secondary price trackers list different tier prices than the official page
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Xano or Softr?▼
Softr scores higher at 4.1/5 vs 4.0/5 for Xano, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Xano and Softr?▼
Xano: Xano is a no-code backend that provides a database, business logic and REST APIs for applications, without managing servers. Softr: Softr is a no-code builder for client portals and internal tools on top of data in Airtable, Google Sheets, HubSpot or a database, so non-developers can publish an app from a template.
Is Xano or Softr more affordable?▼
Xano starts at €0/mo, Softr starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.