Trigger.dev vs Make
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Trigger.dev and Make.
🏆
Verdict: Trigger.dev wins
Trigger.dev scores 4.4/5, edging out Make at 4.2/5. TypeScript teams that want managed, durable background jobs and long-running agent workflows without building queue infrastructure themselves.
Trigger.dev Open-source workflow automation platform for AI agents and integrations | Make Visual automation platform for everyone | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.4 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | TypeScript teams that want managed, durable background jobs and long-running agent workflows without building queue infrastructure themselves. | Ops-minded individuals and small teams who want visual, branching automation with real debugging and do not need self-hosting. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourceapi access | no codefree tier |
| Visit Trigger.dev → | Visit Make → |
Trigger.dev
Pros
- + Checkpoint-resume is real: my two-day paused approval run resumed instantly and billed zero compute while waiting
- + Tasks are plain async functions in your own repo — no DSL, no determinism rules, and warm starts measured in the 100–300ms band the changelog advertises
- + Free tier includes $5 usage credit and dev runs are free; my 800ms-run fan-out at 10k/month cost under a dollar of compute
- + Open-source Apache-2.0 with the same codebase on Cloud and self-hosted, and an unusually active release line (v4.5.12 as of August 2026)
- + Full workflow surface built in: retries, queues, scheduling, idempotency, priority, lifecycle hooks, wait tokens and AI-SDK tool integration
Cons
- - TypeScript/JavaScript only — Python and Go teams are simply not served
- - Production self-hosting means Postgres, Redis, webapp and worker containers plus a build tunnel; the docs get thin exactly where ops gets hard
- - The plan fee is a usage credit, not a ceiling — LLM-heavy agent runs can outrun the included allowance without cost modelling
- - v3 is shut down on Cloud (old triggers and deploys no longer run), and the v3→v4 migration has sharp edges for busy projects
- - Concurrency and log-retention limits bite early (1-day logs on Free), and the 'AI agents' marketing outruns what is fundamentally an execution platform
Make
Pros
- + Visual bundle-level debugger: in my router test I traced dropped records to a timezone filter in under a minute, something Zapier's flat step log makes slow
- + Credit pricing stays cheap at realistic volumes — 10,000 credits/month tiers started at $9–$12/mo billed annually at time of writing (make.com/en/pricing)
- + HTTP, JSON, and XML modules are strong enough to replace custom code for most API glue work in my builds
- + Error handling is explicit: scoped error handlers and break directives mean one bad record does not kill a whole run
- + Celonis ownership and a product dating to 2012 (as Integromat) give it one of the longer reliability track records in the category
Cons
- - Polling triggers burn credits on every scheduled check whether or not data changed; my naive 1-minute poll ate budget until I moved to webhooks
- - No self-hosting and no source-available license — cloud-only, which rules it out for data-residency requirements
- - Run history on the free plan is short (three days at time of writing), so debugging real incidents needs a paid plan
- - The concepts curve (bundles vs arrays, iterators, aggregators) is steeper than Zapier's; expect a week before complex flows feel natural
- - Pricing is inconsistent across sessions — Make has served different Core/Pro/Teams price cards ($9/$16/$29 vs $12/$21/$38 annually), so confirm your quote
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Trigger.dev or Make?▼
Trigger.dev scores higher at 4.4/5 vs 4.2/5 for Make, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Trigger.dev and Make?▼
Trigger.dev: Trigger.dev is an open-source TypeScript platform for long-running background jobs and AI agents, handling retries, queues, concurrency, scheduling and observability. Make: Make is a visual automation platform where you connect apps and build multi-step workflows by drawing them on a canvas.
Is Trigger.dev or Make more affordable?▼
Trigger.dev starts at €0/mo, Make starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.