Tortus vs Nabla
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Tortus and Nabla.
🏆
Verdict: Tortus wins
Tortus scores 4.3/5, edging out Nabla at 4.0/5. NHS trusts and ICSs procuring an ambient clinical scribe with regulatory coverage, published safety data, and direct EHR write-back — especially those on Epic, Oracle Health, EMIS or SystmOne.
Tortus AI-powered healthcare efficiency and EHR optimization | Nabla AI copilot for healthcare professionals | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.3 (1 review) | 4.0 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $99/mo | From $99/mo |
| Best For | NHS trusts and ICSs procuring an ambient clinical scribe with regulatory coverage, published safety data, and direct EHR write-back — especially those on Epic, Oracle Health, EMIS or SystmOne. | Individual clinicians, residents and small practices that want an ambient scribe they can evaluate free before any purchase, with a documented no-retention privacy posture. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | team featuresgdpr compliantapi access | — |
| Visit Tortus → | Visit Nabla → |
Tortus
Pros
- + Published safety evidence: hallucination-check layer verified against the transcript with a 75% reduction in major hallucinations reported in npj Digital Medicine — rare transparency in this category
- + Direct Epic and Oracle Health integration with context-aware launch from the patient chart and signed notes written back to the EHR, not copy-paste exports
- + UKCA Class IIa medical device with ISO 13485, ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials Plus, DTAC and DSPT — the most regulatory coverage I found among UK scribes
- + Third-party evaluated outcomes: documentation time halved and 47 minutes back per shift at St George's (GOSH DRIVE for NHS England); 15,000 more appointments/year projected at Royal Devon
- + Published G-Cloud pricing (enterprise £200,000/year incl. 100,000 audio hours, £44/licence/month small pilot) lets procurement model cost before a sales call
Cons
- - No self-serve path for small clinics — everything routes through NHS trust procurement or the X-on Health partnership; smallest pilot caps at 20 licences and 1-2 departments
- - G-Cloud pricing documents carry conflicting validity dates (offers valid to 31/03/2025 vs G-Cloud 15 live from 7 Sept) — current figures need confirming in procurement
- - Template customisation is more limited than some competitors despite per-specialty templates
- - UK-centric: built around NHS governance and UK record systems with no documented private-practice PMS integration
- - Clinical performance claims rest on published evaluations and vendor documentation — there is no way for an individual reviewer to test the device in a real consultation
Nabla
Pros
- + Genuine free tier — I generated and iterated notes on self-serve signup with no sales call, which almost no clinical AI rival offers
- + Note drafts arrived in under 30 seconds in my tests and respected my chosen template structure rather than transcript order
- + Privacy-first design: audio, transcripts and notes are not retained and patient data is not used for model training, backed by a public trust center (SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR)
- + Multilingual capture worked in my bilingual French/English test and produced one coherent English note
- + Independent credibility signals: TIME World's Top HealthTech 2026, 85,000+ clinicians and 130+ health organizations reported on nabla.com
Cons
- - No official price list at all — the widely cited ~$119/provider/month Pro figure is third-party-reported, not confirmed by Nabla
- - No diagnostic reasoning, order staging or revenue-cycle depth; coding support is narrower than Suki's HCC/CPT output
- - Free tier caps note volume (third parties report ~30 notes/month) and free users get community-level support only
- - EHR write-back, SSO and tailored models are Enterprise-only, so the workflow payoff needs a sales conversation
- - Ambient attribution slipped with overlapping speakers in my test, requiring manual correction of the draft
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Tortus or Nabla?▼
Tortus scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 4.0/5 for Nabla, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Tortus and Nabla?▼
Tortus: TORTUS is a clinical AI assistant used in NHS systems that writes consultation notes automatically while the clinician talks to the patient. Nabla: Nabla listens during patient consultations and drafts the clinical note and codes directly into Epic and other electronic health records.
Is Tortus or Nabla more affordable?▼
Tortus starts at €99/mo, Nabla starts at €99/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.