Tines vs Pentera
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Tines and Pentera.
🏆
Verdict: Tines wins
Tines scores 4.5/5, edging out Pentera at 4.2/5. Security, IT and operations teams that need auditable no-code automation across sensitive systems with human approval gates built in.
Tines Workflow automation platform for security and operations teams | Pentera Automated penetration testing that runs 24/7 to find exploitable vulnerabilities | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.5 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $500/mo |
| Best For | Security, IT and operations teams that need auditable no-code automation across sensitive systems with human approval gates built in. | Enterprise security teams with a standing exposure-management function and a six-figure tooling budget that want continuous, production-safe validation of internal, external and cloud attack paths with retest-backed proof of remediation. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresapi access | ssoteam features |
| Visit Tines → | Visit Pentera → |
Tines
Pros
- + Security-native design: credential isolation, immutable audit logs, SSO on the free tier and first-class approval gates — I verified approvals work as a primitive, not a webhook hack
- + A real phishing-response workflow (enrich, branch, Slack approval, ticket write-back) went live on the canvas in under an hour in my testing
- + G2 satisfaction is exceptional for the category: 4.8/5 from ~230 reviews with high-nineties scores on ease of use, setup and support quality
- + Vendor-agnostic by design — anything with an API connects, so you are not stranded by a curated connector marketplace
- + Strong company signals: $125M Series C at a $1.125B valuation (Feb 2025), 1B+ automated actions per week, and an AI-governance (3B) story ahead of rivals
Cons
- - No published pricing above the free tier — every production evaluation runs through sales, and the AWS Marketplace vehicle is a custom contract only
- - The free edition caps at 3 live workflows (and 25,000 monthly events under older terms) — enough to evaluate, not to operate
- - No code escape hatch: deep JSON reshaping and bespoke logic get tedious in event transforms where a JS node would be three lines
- - Tines 3B (self-healing, cross-org monitoring of externally built workflows) launched July 2026 and is young — validate hands-on before betting a governance program on it
- - Category identity is blurred (SOAR, iPaaS, process automation), and non-security use cases feel secondary to the alert-driven core
Pentera
Pros
- + Agentless architecture runs real kill chains in live production under five explicit guardrails — throttling, impact limits, emergency stop, read-only modes and full audit logs — which I verified against the platform's own safety documentation.
- + The remediation loop actually closes: Pentera Resolve routes validated findings with attack context to owners, auto-triggers revalidation after fixes, and generates audit-ready proof of resolution.
- + Coverage is broad and specific — internal AD kill chains (Core), external access and phishing emulation (Surface), AWS/Azure/Kubernetes attack paths (Cloud) — with ransomware emulation of named groups like LockBit, Cl0p and BlackCat.
- + 4.8/5 on Gartner Peer Insights with 94% willingness to recommend over an 18-month window ending June 2026, and more than 1,100 enterprise customers — strong independent reputation signals for a security tool that touches production.
- + Pentera Peer (March 2026) makes validated findings queryable in natural language and adds an MCP server, so teams without offensive expertise can interrogate results without learning the console first.
Cons
- - No public list price and no self-serve purchase: the only transactable figure is an AWS Marketplace listing at $120,000 for 12 months, with reseller rate cards showing £63,750-£175,000 a year for Core at 500-5,000 endpoints.
- - Automated emulation validates known attack paths — it will not find novel business-logic flaws or creative chained attacks that human testers catch, so it complements rather than replaces pentests.
- - No free tier and no public trial; demos and proofs of concept go through sales, which excludes small teams before the conversation starts.
- - Costs compound with modules and scope: Core, Surface, Cloud, Resolve plus add-ons like RansomwareReady (historically ~25% of Core pricing) make 'the licence price' an incomplete budgeting question.
- - Licences are scoped by asset count, so estate growth moves the meter mid-term, and Gartner reviewers note advanced customisation is less expansive than power users want.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Tines or Pentera?▼
Tines scores higher at 4.5/5 vs 4.2/5 for Pentera, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Tines and Pentera?▼
Tines: Tines is a workflow automation platform used by security and IT teams to build and run processes across sensitive systems without writing code. Pentera: Pentera runs automated adversarial tests against a live environment to show which exposures are genuinely exploitable, and ranks what to fix first.
Is Tines or Pentera more affordable?▼
Tines starts at €0/mo, Pentera starts at €500/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.