Tennr vs Tortus
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Tennr and Tortus.
🏆
Verdict: Tortus wins
Tortus scores 4.3/5, edging out Tennr at 3.9/5. NHS trusts and ICSs procuring an ambient clinical scribe with regulatory coverage, published safety data, and direct EHR write-back — especially those on Epic, Oracle Health, EMIS or SystmOne.
Tennr AI-powered healthcare document automation platform | Tortus AI-powered healthcare efficiency and EHR optimization | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $99/mo | From $99/mo |
| Best For | Specialty practices and multi-site provider groups drowning in referral paperwork and denials who can fund a vendor evaluation and implementation project to automate patient intake end to end. | NHS trusts and ICSs procuring an ambient clinical scribe with regulatory coverage, published safety data, and direct EHR write-back — especially those on Epic, Oracle Health, EMIS or SystmOne. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | api accessgdpr compliantteam features | team featuresgdpr compliantapi access |
| Visit Tennr → | Visit Tortus → |
Tennr
Pros
- + Purpose-built RaeLM models evaluated against payer criteria rather than a generic LLM wrapper — the right architecture for medical documentation
- + Covers the full referral chain: intake from fax/portal/email, missing-document chasing, eligibility, prior auth, routing and outbound calls
- + Tennr Network gives referring providers, receiving providers and patients shared real-time referral status, removing phone tag
- + Financially credible: $101M Series C at $605M valuation (June 2025) with reported eight-figure revenue and hundreds of provider organizations
- + Targets first-pass denials and patient conversion — measurable ROI categories for specialty practices
Cons
- - No public pricing at all — ROI comparison against staffing or competitors requires a sales process
- - Demo-only evaluation: no self-serve trial, no developer docs, no public API reference
- - No published accuracy benchmarks for RaeLM despite error-rate claims anchoring the pitch
- - EHR integration list is not public, so compatibility is unverifiable before engaging sales
- - Implementation touches fax lines, portal inboxes and phone scripts — a real change-management load for staff
Tortus
Pros
- + Published safety evidence: hallucination-check layer verified against the transcript with a 75% reduction in major hallucinations reported in npj Digital Medicine — rare transparency in this category
- + Direct Epic and Oracle Health integration with context-aware launch from the patient chart and signed notes written back to the EHR, not copy-paste exports
- + UKCA Class IIa medical device with ISO 13485, ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials Plus, DTAC and DSPT — the most regulatory coverage I found among UK scribes
- + Third-party evaluated outcomes: documentation time halved and 47 minutes back per shift at St George's (GOSH DRIVE for NHS England); 15,000 more appointments/year projected at Royal Devon
- + Published G-Cloud pricing (enterprise £200,000/year incl. 100,000 audio hours, £44/licence/month small pilot) lets procurement model cost before a sales call
Cons
- - No self-serve path for small clinics — everything routes through NHS trust procurement or the X-on Health partnership; smallest pilot caps at 20 licences and 1-2 departments
- - G-Cloud pricing documents carry conflicting validity dates (offers valid to 31/03/2025 vs G-Cloud 15 live from 7 Sept) — current figures need confirming in procurement
- - Template customisation is more limited than some competitors despite per-specialty templates
- - UK-centric: built around NHS governance and UK record systems with no documented private-practice PMS integration
- - Clinical performance claims rest on published evaluations and vendor documentation — there is no way for an individual reviewer to test the device in a real consultation
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Tennr or Tortus?▼
Tortus scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 3.9/5 for Tennr, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Tennr and Tortus?▼
Tennr: Tennr reads inbound healthcare documents such as referrals and faxes, extracts what matters and routes patients to the right care setting. Tortus: TORTUS is a clinical AI assistant used in NHS systems that writes consultation notes automatically while the clinician talks to the patient.
Is Tennr or Tortus more affordable?▼
Tennr starts at €99/mo, Tortus starts at €99/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.