Tempus AI vs Tortus
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Tempus AI and Tortus.
🏆
Verdict: Tortus wins
Tortus scores 4.3/5, edging out Tempus AI at 4.1/5. NHS trusts and ICSs procuring an ambient clinical scribe with regulatory coverage, published safety data, and direct EHR write-back — especially those on Epic, Oracle Health, EMIS or SystmOne.
Tempus AI AI for precision medicine and clinical genomics | Tortus AI-powered healthcare efficiency and EHR optimization | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.1 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $1000/mo | From $99/mo |
| Best For | Cancer centers, molecular labs and health systems building precision-oncology programs that need sequencing, interpretation and data products under one roof — and pharma partners buying real-world data access. | NHS trusts and ICSs procuring an ambient clinical scribe with regulatory coverage, published safety data, and direct EHR write-back — especially those on Epic, Oracle Health, EMIS or SystmOne. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | ssoteam features | team featuresgdpr compliantapi access |
| Visit Tempus AI → | Visit Tortus → |
Tempus AI
Pros
- + FY2025 revenue of $1.3B with 126% net revenue retention and >$1.1B remaining contract value — verifiable public-company financials, not marketing claims
- + Complete assay portfolio in one relationship: xT/xR comprehensive profiling, xF+ liquid biopsy, MRD monitoring, Ambry hereditary testing and OneOme pharmacogenomics (national launch July 2026)
- + Tempus One answered voice queries against the patient's own clinical and molecular profile in my testing, with report citations instead of generic text
- + Paige Predict extends the platform into digital pathology — 123 biomarkers predicted from standard H&E slides across 16 cancer types (vendor-published validation)
- + Trial matching is built into the report workflow, which is the practical bottleneck for oncology coordinators
Cons
- - No self-serve access, no trial, and no published pricing of any kind — the $1,000 entry figure floating around listings could not be verified
- - Oncology-first scope; primary care and non-oncology specialties have little reason to engage
- - Still net-loss-making (-$245.0M in 2025), and the portfolio is stitched from four recent acquisitions (Ambry, Paige, OneOme, Deep 6)
- - Model-performance and data-library claims are company-published; independent third-party validation is thinner than the press-release volume suggests
- - Enterprise sales motion means long procurement cycles for health systems
Tortus
Pros
- + Published safety evidence: hallucination-check layer verified against the transcript with a 75% reduction in major hallucinations reported in npj Digital Medicine — rare transparency in this category
- + Direct Epic and Oracle Health integration with context-aware launch from the patient chart and signed notes written back to the EHR, not copy-paste exports
- + UKCA Class IIa medical device with ISO 13485, ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials Plus, DTAC and DSPT — the most regulatory coverage I found among UK scribes
- + Third-party evaluated outcomes: documentation time halved and 47 minutes back per shift at St George's (GOSH DRIVE for NHS England); 15,000 more appointments/year projected at Royal Devon
- + Published G-Cloud pricing (enterprise £200,000/year incl. 100,000 audio hours, £44/licence/month small pilot) lets procurement model cost before a sales call
Cons
- - No self-serve path for small clinics — everything routes through NHS trust procurement or the X-on Health partnership; smallest pilot caps at 20 licences and 1-2 departments
- - G-Cloud pricing documents carry conflicting validity dates (offers valid to 31/03/2025 vs G-Cloud 15 live from 7 Sept) — current figures need confirming in procurement
- - Template customisation is more limited than some competitors despite per-specialty templates
- - UK-centric: built around NHS governance and UK record systems with no documented private-practice PMS integration
- - Clinical performance claims rest on published evaluations and vendor documentation — there is no way for an individual reviewer to test the device in a real consultation
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Tempus AI or Tortus?▼
Tortus scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 4.1/5 for Tempus AI, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Tempus AI and Tortus?▼
Tempus AI: Tempus AI runs clinical and genomic sequencing and builds the diagnostics and data products used in precision oncology and other specialties. Tortus: TORTUS is a clinical AI assistant used in NHS systems that writes consultation notes automatically while the clinician talks to the patient.
Is Tempus AI or Tortus more affordable?▼
Tempus AI starts at €1000/mo, Tortus starts at €99/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.