Semgrep vs GitGuardian

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Semgrep and GitGuardian.

🏆

Verdict: GitGuardian wins

GitGuardian scores 4.2/5, edging out Semgrep at 4.1/5. Engineering and security teams of any size that want secrets detection before code merges — starting free for teams up to 25 developers and scaling to governed, self-hostable remediation on Enterprise.

Semgrep

Semgrep

Static analysis engine for finding bugs, security issues, and anti-patterns

GitGuardian

GitGuardian

Detect and remediate secrets leaked in your git repositories

Rating4.1 (1 review)4.2 (1 review)
Pricing Modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting PriceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best ForEngineering teams that want security scanning inside the pull-request workflow, starting from a genuinely free open-source engine and scaling into paid cross-file analysis.Engineering and security teams of any size that want secrets detection before code merges — starting free for teams up to 25 developers and scaling to governed, self-hostable remediation on Enterprise.
Free Tier
API Access
Team Features
Open Source
Tags
free tieropen sourceapi access
free tierteam featuresopen source
Visit Semgrep →Visit GitGuardian →

Semgrep

Pros

  • + Real free tier: the LGPL-2.1 engine and community rulesets run fully in CI — my pip install (v1.136.0) was scanning in minutes
  • + Rule syntax reads like source code, so teams can write custom checks without learning a DSL; autofix suggestions (e.g. shell=True → False) are concrete
  • + Broad language coverage (30+) with an honest per-language capability matrix instead of a blanket claim
  • + Pro rules add cross-file dataflow, reachability, license and malicious-package detection beyond the single-file engine
  • + Developer workflow is complete: PR comments, VS Code/JetBrains plugins, Slack/email, monorepo support, one-click CI

Cons

  • - Community Edition is single-file analysis only — cross-file vulnerability chains require paid Pro rules
  • - Rule-pack choice dominates recall: my four planted bugs — default `p/python` pack found 1, `p/security-audit` found 3 of 4
  • - Per-contributor pricing stacks: Code ($30) plus Secrets ($15) is $45/contributor/month before Supply Chain, at list prices
  • - Scans fetch rules from the Semgrep registry over the network; air-gapped CI needs vendored rules or a private setup
  • - SAST, SCA and Secrets are three separate SKUs and the AI features are credit-metered (20/dev/month on Teams)
View full Semgrepreview →

GitGuardian

Pros

  • + The free tier is genuinely operational: 25 developers, unlimited real-time scanning, and 500 historical scan detections — I found committed test credentials in a small repo within minutes of setup
  • + ggshield is open source and installs as pre-commit hook, GitHub Action, or CLI — wiring prevention into a pipeline took me under half an hour
  • + Detection honesty: the docs openly describe the precision/recall trade-off instead of promising zero false positives
  • + API quota is request-based and documented (10K/month free, 1M on business plans), so CI usage costs are calculable before you automate
  • + AI IDE hooks (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot CLI, VS Code, Codex and others) push prevention to where agents now write code

Cons

  • - It does not rotate or revoke credentials — remediation playbooks route incidents to humans; the catalog's 'automated rotation' claim is wrong
  • - On the free tier, alert triage is manual: AI risk scoring and false-positive filtering are Growth-only
  • - Custom regex detectors are Enterprise-only, so proprietary credential formats need the top tier
  • - Pricing for Growth and Enterprise is quote-only with no published rates — hard to budget without a sales call
  • - Historical scan caps on free (500 detections, 1 GB repo capacity) mean large legacy repos must pay before seeing their full backlog
View full GitGuardianreview →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Semgrep or GitGuardian?▼
GitGuardian scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 4.1/5 for Semgrep, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Semgrep and GitGuardian?▼
Semgrep: Semgrep scans source code for security bugs, secrets and vulnerable dependencies using customisable rules, with AI assistance to filter findings. GitGuardian: GitGuardian scans code, repositories and developer tooling for leaked credentials and helps teams revoke and fix them. It also covers non-human identity governance, and runs as SaaS or self-hosted.
Is Semgrep or GitGuardian more affordable?▼
Semgrep starts at €0/mo, GitGuardian starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.