RunSybil vs Orca Security
A detailed comparison to help you choose between RunSybil and Orca Security.
🏆
Verdict: Orca Security wins
Orca Security scores 4.2/5, edging out RunSybil at 3.6/5. Cloud security teams at mid-market to enterprise scale that want comprehensive multi-cloud visibility and risk ranking without deploying agents on production workloads.
RunSybil AI-powered automated penetration testing for cybersecurity | Orca Security Agentless AI cloud security | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.6 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $99/mo | From $500/mo |
| Best For | Security-serious engineering teams that run pentests on a cadence, want exploit-proven findings against live web apps and APIs without scheduling human testers, and have their own engineers to apply fixes. | Cloud security teams at mid-market to enterprise scale that want comprehensive multi-cloud visibility and risk ranking without deploying agents on production workloads. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | api access | ssoteam features |
| Visit RunSybil → | Visit Orca Security → |
RunSybil
Pros
- + Findings are reproduced before delivery with CWE IDs, CVSS scores, request/response evidence, and reproduction steps — validation-first reporting is the product's strongest habit
- + Retest loop works as advertised: apply the fix, re-run, and get a verdict on that finding in under an hour instead of re-booking a human test weeks out
- + Remediation prompts written for autonomous coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Cursor) closed the gap between finding and fix faster than any report PDF I have handled
- + Black-box default with chaining across auth flows and business logic catches real exploit paths that scanners and BAS tools miss by construction
- + Exceptional founding team (OpenAI's first security hire, ex-Meta red team lead) and $40M from Khosla Ventures with named customers including Cursor, Notion, and Baseten
Cons
- - No published pricing and no self-service signup — evaluation requires a demo and a quote, and competitor analyses call continuous coverage expensive over time
- - Remediation is handed off, not automated: it writes the prompt but does not open pull requests or fix cloud misconfigurations itself
- - My walkthrough stayed on the web/API attack surface — no SAST, dependency scanning, secret detection, or cloud posture, despite broader 'entire stack' homepage claims
- - No signed attestation letter or STRIDE threat model per competitor comparisons (vendor-disputed sources), which weakens the compliance use case
- - Short independent track record: founded 2023, and the claims about coverage breadth outrun what I could verify in the product
Orca Security
Pros
- + True agentless Side-Scanning: full cloud inventory from read-only snapshot access in my trial without installing anything on production workloads
- + Unified Data Model chains exposure, vulnerability, identity and data context so the risk queue is ranked by blast radius rather than raw CVSS
- + Published AWS Marketplace pack pricing ($7,000/$12,000/$17,000/$30,000 per month) gives buyers a real negotiating anchor and counts toward AWS spend commitments
- + Consistent satisfaction signals: 4.6/5 on Gartner Peer Insights and G2, 4.8/5 on Capterra per Orca's reviews page
Cons
- - No low-cost entry point — the marketplace floor is $7,000 per month and direct sales is quote-only, excluding startups and small teams
- - Snapshot-based scanning is periodic; real-time runtime detection is shallower than agent-bearing competitors
- - Risk prioritisation can be opaque when a finding is deprioritised, which matters in audit-driven environments
- - Cloud-only coverage — substantial on-prem estates need a separate tool
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, RunSybil or Orca Security?▼
Orca Security scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 3.6/5 for RunSybil, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between RunSybil and Orca Security?▼
RunSybil: RunSybil runs autonomous offensive security testing against applications, finding exploitable vulnerabilities and filtering out false positives. Orca Security: Agentless cloud security platform that uses AI to detect risks, vulnerabilities, and misconfigurations without installing agents.
Is RunSybil or Orca Security more affordable?▼
RunSybil starts at €99/mo, Orca Security starts at €500/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.