Refact AI vs Sourcegraph Cody
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Refact AI and Sourcegraph Cody.
Refact AI Open-source AI coding assistant with self-hosting | Sourcegraph Cody AI coding assistant with entire codebase context | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.9 (396 reviews) | 3.7 (36 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Privacy-conscious developers wanting a self-hosted AI code assistant | Enterprise engineering teams needing AI with full codebase context across large repos |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tieropen sourcebyok | free tierteam featuresbyok |
| Visit Refact AI → | Visit Sourcegraph Cody → |
Refact AI
Pros
- + Self-hostable for privacy
- + Open-source
- + Usage statistics and analytics
Cons
- - Self-hosting setup required
- - Less capable than Cursor
Sourcegraph Cody
Pros
- + Entire codebase context
- + Enterprise repo support
- + Multiple LLM backend options
Cons
- - Best value at enterprise scale
- - Free tier is limited
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.