Push Security vs Wiz
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Push Security and Wiz.
🏆
Verdict: Wiz wins
Wiz scores 4.3/5, edging out Push Security at 4.0/5. Enterprise multi-cloud security and DevSecOps teams that want the strongest graph-based cloud risk visibility available and can commit to enterprise-scale budgets and contracts.
Push Security Employee browser security for SaaS apps | Wiz AI cloud security platform for enterprises | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $500/mo |
| Best For | Security teams that want identity-attack detection, credential hygiene and SaaS discovery at the browser layer, with a published per-user price and a monitor-first rollout path. | Enterprise multi-cloud security and DevSecOps teams that want the strongest graph-based cloud risk visibility available and can commit to enterprise-scale budgets and contracts. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresbrowser extension | ssoteam featuresapi access |
| Visit Push Security → | Visit Wiz → |
Push Security
Pros
- + Published per-user pricing ($5/user/month annual) with the full feature set included at every deployment size
- + Local-first architecture means routine browsing data never leaves the browser — only detection-rule matches are transmitted
- + Detection set tracks current tradecraft: AitM, BitB/BitM, cloned login pages, ClickFix, session hijacking
- + SaaS, credential and extension discovery delivered visible inventory within days — the shadow-IT map most teams never had
Cons
- - Requires the extension on employee browsers; unmanaged personal devices stay invisible
- - Not an enterprise browser — no managed browser controls, and the DLP features are building blocks rather than a full suite
- - Deployments above 500 employees are quote-based, so the published price stops at mid-market scale
- - Browser-only visibility misses attacks that never touch a browser, such as API tokens used from scripts
Wiz
Pros
- + Security Graph chains exposure, vulnerability, identity and data into single explainable risk paths — in my testing one finding replaced three or four separate console workflows
- + Fastest onboarding in the category: a connected multi-account AWS environment produced a populated asset and exposure graph within hours
- + Graph query language is genuinely productive for both security teams and ad-hoc investigations
- + Full code-to-cloud coverage through Wiz Code, plus DSPM (Wiz Data) and identity analysis, on one risk model
Cons
- - Acquired by Google for $32 billion (completed March 11, 2026) — multi-cloud neutrality is now a question to manage contractually, not an assumption
- - Runtime detection (Wiz Defend) is thinner than dedicated runtime/EDR-grade tools in my hands-on comparison
- - Per-workload quote-based pricing with no self-serve tier scales into serious annual cost; third-party guides put list at roughly $24,000 per 100 workloads per year
- - No meaningful on-premises, network or endpoint coverage
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Push Security or Wiz?▼
Wiz scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 4.0/5 for Push Security, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Push Security and Wiz?▼
Push Security: Browser-based security platform that monitors employee SaaS usage, detects credential risks, and prevents shadow IT threats. Wiz: Cloud security platform providing complete cloud visibility, vulnerability management, and misconfiguration detection with AI.
Is Push Security or Wiz more affordable?▼
Push Security starts at €0/mo, Wiz starts at €500/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.