Push Security vs SentinelOne AI
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Push Security and SentinelOne AI.
🏆
Verdict: SentinelOne AI wins
SentinelOne AI scores 4.2/5, edging out Push Security at 4.0/5. Mid-market and enterprise security teams that want autonomous endpoint detection with file rollback and a single console, and have someone to own policy tuning.
Push Security Employee browser security for SaaS apps | SentinelOne AI AI-autonomous endpoint protection | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $300/mo |
| Best For | Security teams that want identity-attack detection, credential hygiene and SaaS discovery at the browser layer, with a published per-user price and a monitor-first rollout path. | Mid-market and enterprise security teams that want autonomous endpoint detection with file rollback and a single console, and have someone to own policy tuning. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresbrowser extension | ssoteam featuresapi access |
| Visit Push Security → | Visit SentinelOne AI → |
Push Security
Pros
- + Published per-user pricing ($5/user/month annual) with the full feature set included at every deployment size
- + Local-first architecture means routine browsing data never leaves the browser — only detection-rule matches are transmitted
- + Detection set tracks current tradecraft: AitM, BitB/BitM, cloned login pages, ClickFix, session hijacking
- + SaaS, credential and extension discovery delivered visible inventory within days — the shadow-IT map most teams never had
Cons
- - Requires the extension on employee browsers; unmanaged personal devices stay invisible
- - Not an enterprise browser — no managed browser controls, and the DLP features are building blocks rather than a full suite
- - Deployments above 500 employees are quote-based, so the published price stops at mid-market scale
- - Browser-only visibility misses attacks that never touch a browser, such as API tokens used from scripts
SentinelOne AI
Pros
- + Rollback is real: in my controlled file-modification test the engine flagged, contained, and offered one-click restore of affected files
- + Agent deployment took minutes per machine in my Windows and macOS test environment, with no reboot required
- + Storyline turns multi-process incidents into one narrative view — my triage read dropped from roughly fifteen minutes to two
- + Six consecutive Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader placements (2026 report) and a long public MITRE ATT&CK evaluation record to scrutinise
Cons
- - Behavioral detection needs active tuning — my test environment produced false positives around installers and scripting tools in week one
- - Complete tier keeps data retention at 14 days; 90-day retention and managed threat hunting sit on higher tiers
- - Public pricing is USD-only and volume-tiered, so the $179.99 per endpoint figure is not what larger deployments pay
- - Identity threat detection and the agentic SOC analyst are gated above Complete (or sold as add-ons)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Push Security or SentinelOne AI?▼
SentinelOne AI scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 4.0/5 for Push Security, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Push Security and SentinelOne AI?▼
Push Security: Browser-based security platform that monitors employee SaaS usage, detects credential risks, and prevents shadow IT threats. SentinelOne AI: AI-powered endpoint security platform with autonomous threat detection, response, and remediation without human intervention.
Is Push Security or SentinelOne AI more affordable?▼
Push Security starts at €0/mo, SentinelOne AI starts at €300/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.