Push Security vs Pentera
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Push Security and Pentera.
🏆
Verdict: Pentera wins
Pentera scores 4.2/5, edging out Push Security at 4.0/5. Enterprise security teams with a standing exposure-management function and a six-figure tooling budget that want continuous, production-safe validation of internal, external and cloud attack paths with retest-backed proof of remediation.
Push Security Employee browser security for SaaS apps | Pentera Automated penetration testing that runs 24/7 to find exploitable vulnerabilities | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $500/mo |
| Best For | Security teams that want identity-attack detection, credential hygiene and SaaS discovery at the browser layer, with a published per-user price and a monitor-first rollout path. | Enterprise security teams with a standing exposure-management function and a six-figure tooling budget that want continuous, production-safe validation of internal, external and cloud attack paths with retest-backed proof of remediation. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresbrowser extension | ssoteam features |
| Visit Push Security → | Visit Pentera → |
Push Security
Pros
- + Published per-user pricing ($5/user/month annual) with the full feature set included at every deployment size
- + Local-first architecture means routine browsing data never leaves the browser — only detection-rule matches are transmitted
- + Detection set tracks current tradecraft: AitM, BitB/BitM, cloned login pages, ClickFix, session hijacking
- + SaaS, credential and extension discovery delivered visible inventory within days — the shadow-IT map most teams never had
Cons
- - Requires the extension on employee browsers; unmanaged personal devices stay invisible
- - Not an enterprise browser — no managed browser controls, and the DLP features are building blocks rather than a full suite
- - Deployments above 500 employees are quote-based, so the published price stops at mid-market scale
- - Browser-only visibility misses attacks that never touch a browser, such as API tokens used from scripts
Pentera
Pros
- + Agentless architecture runs real kill chains in live production under five explicit guardrails — throttling, impact limits, emergency stop, read-only modes and full audit logs — which I verified against the platform's own safety documentation.
- + The remediation loop actually closes: Pentera Resolve routes validated findings with attack context to owners, auto-triggers revalidation after fixes, and generates audit-ready proof of resolution.
- + Coverage is broad and specific — internal AD kill chains (Core), external access and phishing emulation (Surface), AWS/Azure/Kubernetes attack paths (Cloud) — with ransomware emulation of named groups like LockBit, Cl0p and BlackCat.
- + 4.8/5 on Gartner Peer Insights with 94% willingness to recommend over an 18-month window ending June 2026, and more than 1,100 enterprise customers — strong independent reputation signals for a security tool that touches production.
- + Pentera Peer (March 2026) makes validated findings queryable in natural language and adds an MCP server, so teams without offensive expertise can interrogate results without learning the console first.
Cons
- - No public list price and no self-serve purchase: the only transactable figure is an AWS Marketplace listing at $120,000 for 12 months, with reseller rate cards showing £63,750-£175,000 a year for Core at 500-5,000 endpoints.
- - Automated emulation validates known attack paths — it will not find novel business-logic flaws or creative chained attacks that human testers catch, so it complements rather than replaces pentests.
- - No free tier and no public trial; demos and proofs of concept go through sales, which excludes small teams before the conversation starts.
- - Costs compound with modules and scope: Core, Surface, Cloud, Resolve plus add-ons like RansomwareReady (historically ~25% of Core pricing) make 'the licence price' an incomplete budgeting question.
- - Licences are scoped by asset count, so estate growth moves the meter mid-term, and Gartner reviewers note advanced customisation is less expansive than power users want.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Push Security or Pentera?▼
Pentera scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 4.0/5 for Push Security, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Push Security and Pentera?▼
Push Security: Browser-based security platform that monitors employee SaaS usage, detects credential risks, and prevents shadow IT threats. Pentera: Pentera runs automated adversarial tests against a live environment to show which exposures are genuinely exploitable, and ranks what to fix first.
Is Push Security or Pentera more affordable?▼
Push Security starts at €0/mo, Pentera starts at €500/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.