Push Security vs Orca Security
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Push Security and Orca Security.
🏆
Verdict: Orca Security wins
Orca Security scores 4.2/5, edging out Push Security at 4.0/5. Cloud security teams at mid-market to enterprise scale that want comprehensive multi-cloud visibility and risk ranking without deploying agents on production workloads.
Push Security Employee browser security for SaaS apps | Orca Security Agentless AI cloud security | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $500/mo |
| Best For | Security teams that want identity-attack detection, credential hygiene and SaaS discovery at the browser layer, with a published per-user price and a monitor-first rollout path. | Cloud security teams at mid-market to enterprise scale that want comprehensive multi-cloud visibility and risk ranking without deploying agents on production workloads. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresbrowser extension | ssoteam features |
| Visit Push Security → | Visit Orca Security → |
Push Security
Pros
- + Published per-user pricing ($5/user/month annual) with the full feature set included at every deployment size
- + Local-first architecture means routine browsing data never leaves the browser — only detection-rule matches are transmitted
- + Detection set tracks current tradecraft: AitM, BitB/BitM, cloned login pages, ClickFix, session hijacking
- + SaaS, credential and extension discovery delivered visible inventory within days — the shadow-IT map most teams never had
Cons
- - Requires the extension on employee browsers; unmanaged personal devices stay invisible
- - Not an enterprise browser — no managed browser controls, and the DLP features are building blocks rather than a full suite
- - Deployments above 500 employees are quote-based, so the published price stops at mid-market scale
- - Browser-only visibility misses attacks that never touch a browser, such as API tokens used from scripts
Orca Security
Pros
- + True agentless Side-Scanning: full cloud inventory from read-only snapshot access in my trial without installing anything on production workloads
- + Unified Data Model chains exposure, vulnerability, identity and data context so the risk queue is ranked by blast radius rather than raw CVSS
- + Published AWS Marketplace pack pricing ($7,000/$12,000/$17,000/$30,000 per month) gives buyers a real negotiating anchor and counts toward AWS spend commitments
- + Consistent satisfaction signals: 4.6/5 on Gartner Peer Insights and G2, 4.8/5 on Capterra per Orca's reviews page
Cons
- - No low-cost entry point — the marketplace floor is $7,000 per month and direct sales is quote-only, excluding startups and small teams
- - Snapshot-based scanning is periodic; real-time runtime detection is shallower than agent-bearing competitors
- - Risk prioritisation can be opaque when a finding is deprioritised, which matters in audit-driven environments
- - Cloud-only coverage — substantial on-prem estates need a separate tool
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Push Security or Orca Security?▼
Orca Security scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 4.0/5 for Push Security, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Push Security and Orca Security?▼
Push Security: Browser-based security platform that monitors employee SaaS usage, detects credential risks, and prevents shadow IT threats. Orca Security: Agentless cloud security platform that uses AI to detect risks, vulnerabilities, and misconfigurations without installing agents.
Is Push Security or Orca Security more affordable?▼
Push Security starts at €0/mo, Orca Security starts at €500/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.