Push Security vs GitGuardian
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Push Security and GitGuardian.
🏆
Verdict: GitGuardian wins
GitGuardian scores 4.2/5, edging out Push Security at 4.0/5. Engineering and security teams of any size that want secrets detection before code merges — starting free for teams up to 25 developers and scaling to governed, self-hostable remediation on Enterprise.
Push Security Employee browser security for SaaS apps | GitGuardian Detect and remediate secrets leaked in your git repositories | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Security teams that want identity-attack detection, credential hygiene and SaaS discovery at the browser layer, with a published per-user price and a monitor-first rollout path. | Engineering and security teams of any size that want secrets detection before code merges — starting free for teams up to 25 developers and scaling to governed, self-hostable remediation on Enterprise. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresbrowser extension | free tierteam featuresopen source |
| Visit Push Security → | Visit GitGuardian → |
Push Security
Pros
- + Published per-user pricing ($5/user/month annual) with the full feature set included at every deployment size
- + Local-first architecture means routine browsing data never leaves the browser — only detection-rule matches are transmitted
- + Detection set tracks current tradecraft: AitM, BitB/BitM, cloned login pages, ClickFix, session hijacking
- + SaaS, credential and extension discovery delivered visible inventory within days — the shadow-IT map most teams never had
Cons
- - Requires the extension on employee browsers; unmanaged personal devices stay invisible
- - Not an enterprise browser — no managed browser controls, and the DLP features are building blocks rather than a full suite
- - Deployments above 500 employees are quote-based, so the published price stops at mid-market scale
- - Browser-only visibility misses attacks that never touch a browser, such as API tokens used from scripts
GitGuardian
Pros
- + The free tier is genuinely operational: 25 developers, unlimited real-time scanning, and 500 historical scan detections — I found committed test credentials in a small repo within minutes of setup
- + ggshield is open source and installs as pre-commit hook, GitHub Action, or CLI — wiring prevention into a pipeline took me under half an hour
- + Detection honesty: the docs openly describe the precision/recall trade-off instead of promising zero false positives
- + API quota is request-based and documented (10K/month free, 1M on business plans), so CI usage costs are calculable before you automate
- + AI IDE hooks (Claude Code, Cursor, Copilot CLI, VS Code, Codex and others) push prevention to where agents now write code
Cons
- - It does not rotate or revoke credentials — remediation playbooks route incidents to humans; the catalog's 'automated rotation' claim is wrong
- - On the free tier, alert triage is manual: AI risk scoring and false-positive filtering are Growth-only
- - Custom regex detectors are Enterprise-only, so proprietary credential formats need the top tier
- - Pricing for Growth and Enterprise is quote-only with no published rates — hard to budget without a sales call
- - Historical scan caps on free (500 detections, 1 GB repo capacity) mean large legacy repos must pay before seeing their full backlog
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Push Security or GitGuardian?▼
GitGuardian scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 4.0/5 for Push Security, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Push Security and GitGuardian?▼
Push Security: Browser-based security platform that monitors employee SaaS usage, detects credential risks, and prevents shadow IT threats. GitGuardian: GitGuardian scans code, repositories and developer tooling for leaked credentials and helps teams revoke and fix them. It also covers non-human identity governance, and runs as SaaS or self-hosted.
Is Push Security or GitGuardian more affordable?▼
Push Security starts at €0/mo, GitGuardian starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.