Push Security vs Abnormal AI
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Push Security and Abnormal AI.
🏆
Verdict: Abnormal AI wins
Abnormal AI scores 4.3/5, edging out Push Security at 4.0/5. Enterprise security teams on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace whose top risk is BEC, account takeover and vendor fraud rather than malware, and who can budget for quote-based pricing.
Push Security Employee browser security for SaaS apps | Abnormal AI AI-powered email security that stops advanced threats before they land | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $300/mo |
| Best For | Security teams that want identity-attack detection, credential hygiene and SaaS discovery at the browser layer, with a published per-user price and a monitor-first rollout path. | Enterprise security teams on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace whose top risk is BEC, account takeover and vendor fraud rather than malware, and who can budget for quote-based pricing. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresbrowser extension | ssoteam features |
| Visit Push Security → | Visit Abnormal AI → |
Push Security
Pros
- + Published per-user pricing ($5/user/month annual) with the full feature set included at every deployment size
- + Local-first architecture means routine browsing data never leaves the browser — only detection-rule matches are transmitted
- + Detection set tracks current tradecraft: AitM, BitB/BitM, cloned login pages, ClickFix, session hijacking
- + SaaS, credential and extension discovery delivered visible inventory within days — the shadow-IT map most teams never had
Cons
- - Requires the extension on employee browsers; unmanaged personal devices stay invisible
- - Not an enterprise browser — no managed browser controls, and the DLP features are building blocks rather than a full suite
- - Deployments above 500 employees are quote-based, so the published price stops at mid-market scale
- - Browser-only visibility misses attacks that never touch a browser, such as API tokens used from scripts
Abnormal AI
Pros
- + False-positive rate is the lowest I have observed in email security — quarantine trust is achievable, which changes how teams work
- + API deployment into Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace in minutes with no MX or mail-flow changes
- + Incident forensics give relationship context and remediation in one view — I watched analysts close BEC tickets without a second tool
- + Two consecutive Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader placements for Email Security (2024, 2025) plus Forrester Wave Leader (Q2 2025)
Cons
- - No published pricing — quote-only per-user contracts that scale with headcount, with third-party medians in the $40K+/year range
- - Not a gateway: no attachment detonation at delivery time and limited value for hybrid/on-prem mail flows
- - The expanding AI-governance surface is wider than most small security teams can adopt at once
- - Slow-burn social engineering inside normal relationship patterns is the methodology's inherent blind spot
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Push Security or Abnormal AI?▼
Abnormal AI scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 4.0/5 for Push Security, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Push Security and Abnormal AI?▼
Push Security: Browser-based security platform that monitors employee SaaS usage, detects credential risks, and prevents shadow IT threats. Abnormal AI: Abnormal AI is a behavioral AI security platform that protects email, identity and AI tools from phishing, account takeover and insider threats for security teams at organizations.
Is Push Security or Abnormal AI more affordable?▼
Push Security starts at €0/mo, Abnormal AI starts at €300/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.