Polycam vs Unity Sentis
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Polycam and Unity Sentis.
Polycam AI 3D scanning from your phone | Unity Sentis Run neural networks directly in Unity games without external servers | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 (199 reviews) | 5.0 (69 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | free |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free |
| Best For | Architects, designers, and game developers digitizing real-world objects and spaces | Game studios embedding AI behaviors directly into games without cloud infrastructure or latency requirements. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tiermobile app | free tieropen source |
| Visit Polycam → | Visit Unity Sentis → |
Polycam
Pros
- + Mobile 3D scanning
- + High-quality photogrammetry
- + Export to all major formats
Cons
- - Best results need LiDAR iPhone
- - Large file sizes
Unity Sentis
Pros
- + Run models offline with zero latency or server dependency
- + Support multiple platforms including mobile and console builds
- + Import standard ONNX format models from TensorFlow, PyTorch, or other frameworks
- + Integrate directly into existing Unity workflows without external tools
Cons
- - Performance varies significantly by target platform and model complexity
- - Limited built-in tooling for training; requires external ML frameworks
- - Documentation focuses on inference rather than game-specific optimization patterns
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.