MIRI vs Tortus
A detailed comparison to help you choose between MIRI and Tortus.
🏆
Verdict: Tortus wins
Tortus scores 4.3/5, edging out MIRI at 2.6/5. NHS trusts and ICSs procuring an ambient clinical scribe with regulatory coverage, published safety data, and direct EHR write-back — especially those on Epic, Oracle Health, EMIS or SystmOne.
MIRI AI-powered personalized health and wellness coaching | Tortus AI-powered healthcare efficiency and EHR optimization | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 2.6 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $99/mo |
| Best For | Patients or clients of a partner clinic that issues access codes, and health and wellness operators evaluating a white-labeled AI coaching layer — not general consumers shopping for a health coach today. | NHS trusts and ICSs procuring an ambient clinical scribe with regulatory coverage, published safety data, and direct EHR write-back — especially those on Epic, Oracle Health, EMIS or SystmOne. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tiermobile app | team featuresgdpr compliantapi access |
| Visit MIRI → | Visit Tortus → |
MIRI
Pros
- + Consumer apps exist on both iOS and Android and are free to download at time of writing, with a simple log-meals, log-medication, log-mood loop
- + The coaching content is shaped by named practitioners (the site lists lifestyle-medicine physician Dr. Poonam Desai among its advisors) rather than an anonymous model prompt
- + The B2B platform is well aimed at its actual buyer: white-labeled engagement between visits plus operator-facing churn-risk signals drawn from real behavior, not survey snapshots
- + Founding team combines consumer-scale engineering experience (Lyft lineage per the About page) with clinicians who have run behavioral health companies
- + Honest scope language on the About page about extending protocols rather than replacing clinicians
Cons
- - General consumer sign-up is closed at time of writing — the web product is clinic-code or waitlist only while the business pivots
- - No public pricing anywhere: no tiers, no self-serve checkout, not even a starting price for the platform
- - The current consumer app is nutrition-centric, narrower than the sleep, weight, stress, and eating coaching promised in the 2023-era listings
- - Near-zero independent review footprint and no published clinical validation or safety documentation for a product that touches medication logging
- - The '24/7 expert advice' framing in the listing conflates an always-on AI coach with human expert access, which the product does not appear to offer
Tortus
Pros
- + Published safety evidence: hallucination-check layer verified against the transcript with a 75% reduction in major hallucinations reported in npj Digital Medicine — rare transparency in this category
- + Direct Epic and Oracle Health integration with context-aware launch from the patient chart and signed notes written back to the EHR, not copy-paste exports
- + UKCA Class IIa medical device with ISO 13485, ISO 27001, Cyber Essentials Plus, DTAC and DSPT — the most regulatory coverage I found among UK scribes
- + Third-party evaluated outcomes: documentation time halved and 47 minutes back per shift at St George's (GOSH DRIVE for NHS England); 15,000 more appointments/year projected at Royal Devon
- + Published G-Cloud pricing (enterprise £200,000/year incl. 100,000 audio hours, £44/licence/month small pilot) lets procurement model cost before a sales call
Cons
- - No self-serve path for small clinics — everything routes through NHS trust procurement or the X-on Health partnership; smallest pilot caps at 20 licences and 1-2 departments
- - G-Cloud pricing documents carry conflicting validity dates (offers valid to 31/03/2025 vs G-Cloud 15 live from 7 Sept) — current figures need confirming in procurement
- - Template customisation is more limited than some competitors despite per-specialty templates
- - UK-centric: built around NHS governance and UK record systems with no documented private-practice PMS integration
- - Clinical performance claims rest on published evaluations and vendor documentation — there is no way for an individual reviewer to test the device in a real consultation
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, MIRI or Tortus?▼
Tortus scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 2.6/5 for MIRI, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between MIRI and Tortus?▼
MIRI: AI health platform providing personalized wellness coaching, nutrition guidance, and fitness recommendations with 24/7 access to expert advice. Tortus: TORTUS is a clinical AI assistant used in NHS systems that writes consultation notes automatically while the clinician talks to the patient.
Is MIRI or Tortus more affordable?▼
MIRI starts at €0/mo, Tortus starts at €99/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.