Mimecast vs Tines
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Mimecast and Tines.
🏆
Verdict: Tines wins
Tines scores 4.5/5, edging out Mimecast at 3.9/5. Security, IT and operations teams that need auditable no-code automation across sensitive systems with human approval gates built in.
Mimecast AI email security and cyber resilience | Tines Workflow automation platform for security and operations teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 (1 review) | 4.5 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | freemium |
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Free tier available |
| Best For | Mid-market and enterprise organizations on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace that want email threat protection, continuity, and compliance archiving from a single established vendor, with admin capacity to run it. | Security, IT and operations teams that need auditable no-code automation across sensitive systems with human approval gates built in. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | ssoteam features | free tierteam featuresapi access |
| Visit Mimecast → | Visit Tines → |
Mimecast
Pros
- + Continuity is a first-class function of the inline gateway — mail flow and inspection survive primary mail-server outages, which few bundled competitors match
- + The suite genuinely consolidates: gateway security, archiving, DMARC, continuity, and awareness training from one vendor and console
- + AI detection targets the attacks that slip past signatures — social-graph anomaly detection, computer-vision impersonation checks, on-click URL re-protection
- + Deployment flexibility covers M365, Google, on-premise, and hybrid with granular per-user policy segmentation
- + Analyst validation is current: Gartner named Mimecast a Leader in the December 2025 Magic Quadrant for Email Security
Cons
- - No public pricing at all — every deal is a quoted negotiation; cost guides put typical spend at $5–15 per user per month with 5–8% annual uplifts unless capped
- - Configuration complexity is the consistent complaint across third-party reviews; in my testing of the admin surface, meaningful tuning needed a dedicated administrator
- - Archiving storage overages and Gold support add-ons (reported at 10–20% on top) can surprise budgets
- - Teams already on Microsoft 365 E5 face substantial feature overlap — the overlap math should be done before buying
- - Coverage is email-and-collaboration only; endpoint, network, and identity security require other purchases
Tines
Pros
- + Security-native design: credential isolation, immutable audit logs, SSO on the free tier and first-class approval gates — I verified approvals work as a primitive, not a webhook hack
- + A real phishing-response workflow (enrich, branch, Slack approval, ticket write-back) went live on the canvas in under an hour in my testing
- + G2 satisfaction is exceptional for the category: 4.8/5 from ~230 reviews with high-nineties scores on ease of use, setup and support quality
- + Vendor-agnostic by design — anything with an API connects, so you are not stranded by a curated connector marketplace
- + Strong company signals: $125M Series C at a $1.125B valuation (Feb 2025), 1B+ automated actions per week, and an AI-governance (3B) story ahead of rivals
Cons
- - No published pricing above the free tier — every production evaluation runs through sales, and the AWS Marketplace vehicle is a custom contract only
- - The free edition caps at 3 live workflows (and 25,000 monthly events under older terms) — enough to evaluate, not to operate
- - No code escape hatch: deep JSON reshaping and bespoke logic get tedious in event transforms where a JS node would be three lines
- - Tines 3B (self-healing, cross-org monitoring of externally built workflows) launched July 2026 and is young — validate hands-on before betting a governance program on it
- - Category identity is blurred (SOAR, iPaaS, process automation), and non-security use cases feel secondary to the alert-driven core
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Mimecast or Tines?▼
Tines scores higher at 4.5/5 vs 3.9/5 for Mimecast, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Mimecast and Tines?▼
Mimecast: Mimecast secures email and collaboration tools against phishing and impersonation, and manages the human risk side with awareness training. Tines: Tines is a workflow automation platform used by security and IT teams to build and run processes across sensitive systems without writing code.
Is Mimecast or Tines more affordable?▼
Mimecast starts at €200/mo, Tines starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.