Mimecast vs Cato Networks
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Mimecast and Cato Networks.
🏆
Verdict: Cato Networks wins
Cato Networks scores 4.3/5, edging out Mimecast at 3.9/5. Distributed mid-market and enterprise organizations replacing MPLS, VPN, and point security products with one converged SASE platform managed from a single console.
Mimecast AI email security and cyber resilience | Cato Networks AI-powered SASE cloud platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | From $500/mo |
| Best For | Mid-market and enterprise organizations on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace that want email threat protection, continuity, and compliance archiving from a single established vendor, with admin capacity to run it. | Distributed mid-market and enterprise organizations replacing MPLS, VPN, and point security products with one converged SASE platform managed from a single console. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | ssoteam features | ssoteam features |
| Visit Mimecast → | Visit Cato Networks → |
Mimecast
Pros
- + Continuity is a first-class function of the inline gateway — mail flow and inspection survive primary mail-server outages, which few bundled competitors match
- + The suite genuinely consolidates: gateway security, archiving, DMARC, continuity, and awareness training from one vendor and console
- + AI detection targets the attacks that slip past signatures — social-graph anomaly detection, computer-vision impersonation checks, on-click URL re-protection
- + Deployment flexibility covers M365, Google, on-premise, and hybrid with granular per-user policy segmentation
- + Analyst validation is current: Gartner named Mimecast a Leader in the December 2025 Magic Quadrant for Email Security
Cons
- - No public pricing at all — every deal is a quoted negotiation; cost guides put typical spend at $5–15 per user per month with 5–8% annual uplifts unless capped
- - Configuration complexity is the consistent complaint across third-party reviews; in my testing of the admin surface, meaningful tuning needed a dedicated administrator
- - Archiving storage overages and Gold support add-ons (reported at 10–20% on top) can surprise budgets
- - Teams already on Microsoft 365 E5 face substantial feature overlap — the overlap math should be done before buying
- - Coverage is email-and-collaboration only; endpoint, network, and identity security require other purchases
Cato Networks
Pros
- + Genuine convergence: in my review of the console and architecture docs, firewall, web security and SD-WAN share one policy object model — not four products behind one login
- + The private backbone (85+ PoPs, full compute at each) draws consistent praise in reviews for predictable branch performance and sub-second failover
- + One console with one policy framework cuts misconfiguration risk — a theme across Gartner Peer Insights reviews I read
- + Current analyst standing is strong: Gartner Single-Vendor SASE MQ Leader in 2024 and 2025, 4.7/5 on Peer Insights across 275+ reviews
- + Platform breadth keeps growing in useful directions — IoT/OT security, AI usage controls, private AI model protection — without bolt-on products
Cons
- - Quote-only pricing with per-site bandwidth minimums (~10 Mbps) — budgeting requires a sales cycle, and small single sites face poor economics
- - Security depth has documented limits: DLP scanning caps at 20MB per file and CASB granularity trails data-security specialists per third-party comparison
- - No free tier or self-service evaluation exists — everything starts with contact sales
- - Cloud-managed by design means troubleshooting depends on Cato's visibility; critical reviews cite slow resolution on network issues
- - Any deployment is a network transition — appliances, routing, and a migration window even though the cloud side is vendor-managed
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Mimecast or Cato Networks?▼
Cato Networks scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 3.9/5 for Mimecast, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Mimecast and Cato Networks?▼
Mimecast: Mimecast secures email and collaboration tools against phishing and impersonation, and manages the human risk side with awareness training. Cato Networks: Cato Networks provides SASE from the cloud, combining SD-WAN, secure web gateway, firewall and zero-trust access on a single global network.
Is Mimecast or Cato Networks more affordable?▼
Mimecast starts at €200/mo, Cato Networks starts at €500/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.