Luminar Neo vs Khroma
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Luminar Neo and Khroma.
Luminar Neo AI-powered photo editor with intelligent masking and style transfer | Khroma AI color palette generator trained on you | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 (256 reviews) | 4.8 (170 reviews) |
| Pricing Model | paid | free |
| Starting Price | From €10/mo | Free |
| Best For | Photographers and designers wanting AI-accelerated editing with quick turnaround on portraits, landscapes, and commercial shots without learning complex masking techniques. | Designers needing a personalized AI color palette generator |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | free tier |
| Visit Luminar Neo → | Visit Khroma → |
Luminar Neo
Pros
- + Automate sky replacement and background removal with one-click AI masking
- + Use as plugin in Photoshop or Lightroom for non-destructive workflows
- + Access generative fill and style transfer without subscription costs
- + Process images locally without cloud uploads
Cons
- - Limited advanced masking control compared to Photoshop for complex selections
- - Performance depends on local GPU; can be slow on older hardware
- - Smaller ecosystem of third-party extensions than established platforms
Khroma
Pros
- + Learns your personal taste
- + Infinite palette generation
- + Type combination previews
Cons
- - Color palettes only
- - No export to design tools directly
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.