Looq vs Clarisights
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Looq and Clarisights.
🏆
Verdict: Clarisights wins
Clarisights scores 4.2/5, edging out Looq at 3.7/5. Enterprise performance marketing teams spending across many channels and markets who need governed self-service analytics instead of data-team ticket queues.
Looq Handheld 3D survey capture for infrastructure projects | Clarisights Unified analytics platform for marketing performance across channels | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $500/mo |
| Best For | Utility, T&D and civil teams that need frequent, safe ground-level 3D capture of infrastructure between full survey campaigns and want CAD-ready deliverables without LiDAR or drone programs. | Enterprise performance marketing teams spending across many channels and markets who need governed self-service analytics instead of data-team ticket queues. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | ssoteam featuresapi access |
| Visit Looq → | Visit Clarisights → |
Looq
Pros
- + One capture chain covers setup, capture, PPK processing, control alignment, drafting and CAD/GIS export (GeoTIFF, LAZ, SHP, DXF, CSV) — no LiDAR or drone logistics
- + Honest tiered accuracy publishing: ~3 cm global out of the box, ~2 cm with a local base, sub-cm with control, relative under 5 mm — each tier priced by effort, not quoted at best case
- + Live residual preview and PDF accuracy reports in the Align step give licensed surveyors the adjustment workflow they actually require
- + Semantic classification (poles, wires, signs, vegetation) plus qPole engineering-ready pole models turn point clouds into asset inventories for utility workflows
- + Field ergonomics: single-screen capture with path tracking, automatic people/vehicle filtering, IP67 body and 4-5 hour battery suited to real work days
Cons
- - Not a software-only purchase: real capture needs the qCam on a custom quote; the only published software number I found is $29.99/month for Pro (third-party), with one listing showing hardware-scale pricing above $30,000
- - Accuracy conditions are strict — 3-5 cm RMS assumes ideal GNSS and a reference station within 10 km; canopy and urban canyons degrade it
- - Purely optical: unseen geometry (pole backs across ditches, crossarm undersides) needs supplementary capture; the vendor's own FAQ acknowledges crews crossing the road for pole tags
- - Capture above walking pace awaits future software updates; current run-rates are ~250 poles/day on foot, ~450 hybrid (vendor figures)
- - Early-stage company: 15 employees and $3.75M total funding as of the 2024 launch — a durability consideration for a hardware-dependent field program
Clarisights
Pros
- + Self-service exploration is real: in my test a non-SQL marketer answered a cross-market affiliate question in about 10 minutes instead of filing a data ticket
- + Central metric definitions (blended CAC, contribution-margin ROAS) mean the same number everywhere, which fixes the four-teams-four-ROAS problem I see in most enterprises
- + Marketing data MCP exposes the governed semantic layer to AI assistants with the user's own ACL — cross-channel metrics arrive as single, trustworthy columns
- + Channel data reconciled cleanly against Meta and Google platform UIs at campaign and ad-set level in my checks
- + G2 record is strong for the category: 4.9/5 from 63 reviews at time of writing, with roughly a month reported time-to-implement
Cons
- - No published pricing and no self-serve purchase — every evaluation goes through a sales process
- - Free trial status is contradictory across review sites (G2 lists one, Capterra lists none), so budget extra clarification time
- - Narrow by design: no general-purpose SQL surface, no warehouse modelling for non-marketing data, purpose-built charting only
- - Custom campaign naming taxonomies still need human cleanup — the platform surfaces inconsistencies but does not fix them
- - Small vendor (about 33 staff) with a concentrated enterprise customer base is a genuine long-term dependency risk
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Looq or Clarisights?▼
Clarisights scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 3.7/5 for Looq, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Looq and Clarisights?▼
Looq: Looq AI captures survey-grade 3D point clouds from handheld photogrammetry, used for land survey, civil engineering and utility infrastructure work without LiDAR. Clarisights: Clarisights brings paid marketing data from every channel into one reporting platform, so enterprise teams can compare and explore campaign performance in one place.
Is Looq or Clarisights more affordable?▼
Looq starts at €0/mo, Clarisights starts at €500/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.