Lindy AI vs n8n
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Lindy AI and n8n.
🏆
Verdict: n8n wins
n8n scores 4.3/5, edging out Lindy AI at 3.7/5. Technical teams and engineers who want code-level control and the option to self-host automation as core infrastructure.
Lindy AI Your AI employee for every workflow | n8n Workflow automation that gives you control | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Founders and executives who want an AI assistant to own inbox triage, scheduling, meeting prep and follow-up drafts without building workflows themselves. | Technical teams and engineers who want code-level control and the option to self-host automation as core infrastructure. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | no codefree tier | open sourcefree tierapi access |
| Visit Lindy AI → | Visit n8n → |
Lindy AI
Pros
- + Inbox triage matched my own sorting on roughly 4 of 5 messages in a week of real mail
- + SMS/iMessage access to a real pre-meeting digest worked well away from the desk
- + Credits pause instead of overaging when the pool runs out — no surprise bills, confirmed in docs and in my run
- + Calendar write actions landed correctly every time in my testing
- + Plain-English agent setup: a post-call follow-up flow built from a prompt in about 15 minutes
Cons
- - Credit consumption is hard to forecast before use; '3k credits/user/month' does not translate into meetings or emails
- - Lindy's own websites disagree on plan names, prices and credit allowances (Plus $29.99 vs $49.99; Free/Pro/Business vs Plus/Pro/Max)
- - Phone calls are English-only with a single concurrent call on entry tiers
- - Drafts on long CC-heavy or mixed-language threads were occasionally tone-deaf, so auto-send felt risky
- - Notion write actions needed an occasional retry in my runs
n8n
Pros
- + Unlimited steps per execution: my 20-node nightly sync counted as one execution, so complexity stops driving cost (n8n.io/pricing)
- + Code nodes (JS/Python) with npm and env-var access meant I finished every prototype without leaving the platform
- + Self-hostable with no licence fee under the Sustainable Use License; full run snapshots and re-run-from-failed-node debugging
- + AI agent nodes (LLM connectors, vector stores, agents calling workflows as tools) are the deepest of any general automation platform I tested
- + Strong company trajectory: $180M Series C (Accel, Oct 2025) and a SAP strategic investment at ~$5.2B in May 2026
Cons
- - Not open source — the Sustainable Use License (fair-code) forbids offering n8n as a hosted service and fails OSI procurement checks
- - Assumes engineering literacy: JSON paths, expressions, and async data structures stumped every ops-only user I watched try it
- - Self-hosting carries real ops cost — queue mode, worker scaling and upgrades took me hours that a managed platform absorbs
- - Documentation is thin at the edges; AI node options and queue-mode config sent me to community forum threads
- - Business cloud tier is self-hosted-only at time of writing (cloud waitlisted), leaving a gap between Pro's 10K executions and Enterprise
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Lindy AI or n8n?▼
n8n scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 3.7/5 for Lindy AI, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Lindy AI and n8n?▼
Lindy AI: Lindy builds AI assistants that connect to a company's tools and carry out recurring work such as email, scheduling and CRM updates. n8n: n8n is a workflow automation platform that combines AI capabilities with business process automation, giving technical teams a visual builder with the option to add code when needed.
Is Lindy AI or n8n more affordable?▼
Lindy AI starts at €0/mo, n8n starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.