Lacework vs Wiz
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Lacework and Wiz.
🏆
Verdict: Wiz wins
Wiz scores 4.3/5, edging out Lacework at 3.6/5. Enterprise multi-cloud security and DevSecOps teams that want the strongest graph-based cloud risk visibility available and can commit to enterprise-scale budgets and contracts.
Lacework AI cloud security platform | Wiz AI cloud security platform for enterprises | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.6 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $500/mo |
| Best For | Enterprise cloud security teams already invested in, or open to, the Fortinet ecosystem who want behavioural anomaly detection on top of standard CNAPP coverage. | Enterprise multi-cloud security and DevSecOps teams that want the strongest graph-based cloud risk visibility available and can commit to enterprise-scale budgets and contracts. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | ssoteam features | ssoteam featuresapi access |
| Visit Lacework → | Visit Wiz → |
Lacework
Pros
- + Polygraph behavioural baselining groups noisy multi-account events into a small number of narrative incidents with attack paths, rather than per-rule alert spam
- + Hybrid agent plus agentless data collection gives broad day-one coverage without committing to agent deployment everywhere
- + Actively maintained under Fortinet — versioned FortiCNAPP release notes continue through 2025-2026 on Fortinet's documentation site
- + Homegrown data lake correlates events across accounts and long retention windows without a separate SIEM
Cons
- - Acquired by Fortinet (completed August 1, 2024); the standalone Lacework buying motion is gone and roadmap now sits inside Fortinet's portfolio strategy
- - No published list price, no free tier and no self-serve signup — quote-based enterprise sales only
- - Cloud-only: no coverage for on-premises or legacy estates
- - Behavioural baselining needs a learning period that produces an initially confusing stream of low-confidence anomalies
Wiz
Pros
- + Security Graph chains exposure, vulnerability, identity and data into single explainable risk paths — in my testing one finding replaced three or four separate console workflows
- + Fastest onboarding in the category: a connected multi-account AWS environment produced a populated asset and exposure graph within hours
- + Graph query language is genuinely productive for both security teams and ad-hoc investigations
- + Full code-to-cloud coverage through Wiz Code, plus DSPM (Wiz Data) and identity analysis, on one risk model
Cons
- - Acquired by Google for $32 billion (completed March 11, 2026) — multi-cloud neutrality is now a question to manage contractually, not an assumption
- - Runtime detection (Wiz Defend) is thinner than dedicated runtime/EDR-grade tools in my hands-on comparison
- - Per-workload quote-based pricing with no self-serve tier scales into serious annual cost; third-party guides put list at roughly $24,000 per 100 workloads per year
- - No meaningful on-premises, network or endpoint coverage
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Lacework or Wiz?▼
Wiz scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 3.6/5 for Lacework, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Lacework and Wiz?▼
Lacework: Cloud-native application protection platform using AI to detect threats, vulnerabilities, and misconfigurations across cloud infrastructure. Wiz: Cloud security platform providing complete cloud visibility, vulnerability management, and misconfiguration detection with AI.
Is Lacework or Wiz more affordable?▼
Lacework starts at €500/mo, Wiz starts at €500/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.