Lacework vs Abnormal AI
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Lacework and Abnormal AI.
🏆
Verdict: Abnormal AI wins
Abnormal AI scores 4.3/5, edging out Lacework at 3.6/5. Enterprise security teams on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace whose top risk is BEC, account takeover and vendor fraud rather than malware, and who can budget for quote-based pricing.
Lacework AI cloud security platform | Abnormal AI AI-powered email security that stops advanced threats before they land | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.6 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $300/mo |
| Best For | Enterprise cloud security teams already invested in, or open to, the Fortinet ecosystem who want behavioural anomaly detection on top of standard CNAPP coverage. | Enterprise security teams on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace whose top risk is BEC, account takeover and vendor fraud rather than malware, and who can budget for quote-based pricing. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | ssoteam features | ssoteam features |
| Visit Lacework → | Visit Abnormal AI → |
Lacework
Pros
- + Polygraph behavioural baselining groups noisy multi-account events into a small number of narrative incidents with attack paths, rather than per-rule alert spam
- + Hybrid agent plus agentless data collection gives broad day-one coverage without committing to agent deployment everywhere
- + Actively maintained under Fortinet — versioned FortiCNAPP release notes continue through 2025-2026 on Fortinet's documentation site
- + Homegrown data lake correlates events across accounts and long retention windows without a separate SIEM
Cons
- - Acquired by Fortinet (completed August 1, 2024); the standalone Lacework buying motion is gone and roadmap now sits inside Fortinet's portfolio strategy
- - No published list price, no free tier and no self-serve signup — quote-based enterprise sales only
- - Cloud-only: no coverage for on-premises or legacy estates
- - Behavioural baselining needs a learning period that produces an initially confusing stream of low-confidence anomalies
Abnormal AI
Pros
- + False-positive rate is the lowest I have observed in email security — quarantine trust is achievable, which changes how teams work
- + API deployment into Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace in minutes with no MX or mail-flow changes
- + Incident forensics give relationship context and remediation in one view — I watched analysts close BEC tickets without a second tool
- + Two consecutive Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader placements for Email Security (2024, 2025) plus Forrester Wave Leader (Q2 2025)
Cons
- - No published pricing — quote-only per-user contracts that scale with headcount, with third-party medians in the $40K+/year range
- - Not a gateway: no attachment detonation at delivery time and limited value for hybrid/on-prem mail flows
- - The expanding AI-governance surface is wider than most small security teams can adopt at once
- - Slow-burn social engineering inside normal relationship patterns is the methodology's inherent blind spot
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Lacework or Abnormal AI?▼
Abnormal AI scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 3.6/5 for Lacework, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Lacework and Abnormal AI?▼
Lacework: Cloud-native application protection platform using AI to detect threats, vulnerabilities, and misconfigurations across cloud infrastructure. Abnormal AI: Abnormal AI is a behavioral AI security platform that protects email, identity and AI tools from phishing, account takeover and insider threats for security teams at organizations.
Is Lacework or Abnormal AI more affordable?▼
Lacework starts at €500/mo, Abnormal AI starts at €300/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.