Kinetix vs Polycam
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Kinetix and Polycam.
🏆
Verdict: Polycam wins
Polycam scores 4.0/5, edging out Kinetix at 3.5/5. Architects, contractors and facility teams with LiDAR iPhones who need phone-scanned floor plans, measurements and CAD-ready exports without a scanning crew.
Kinetix AI-powered animation engine for game developers | Polycam AI 3D scanning from your phone | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.5 (1 review) | 4.0 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Studios and virtual-world operators with avatar-based multiplayer games who want to offer players in-game emote creation from video with moderation and per-emote monetization built in. | Architects, contractors and facility teams with LiDAR iPhones who need phone-scanned floor plans, measurements and CAD-ready exports without a scanning crew. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierapi access | free tiermobile app |
| Visit Kinetix → | Visit Polycam → |
Kinetix
Pros
- + Video-to-emote generation works on clean full-body movement — my test clips of waves and dance moves came back with the rhythm and poses recognizable on the avatar
- + Retargeting landed the same generated motion on differently-proportioned skeletons without manual bone mapping, which is the hard part of in-game animation UGC
- + Commercial model is aligned with UGC: free integration, 10,000 free emotes on Basic (50,000 on Enterprise), then €0.15 per generation that studios can resell to players
- + Content moderation is a platform feature (automated review of both animations and source video), plus emote streaming — the live-ops plumbing UGC features actually need
- + Production evidence: Kinetix powers in-game emote creation in OVERDARE (KRAFTON's UGC platform), covered in the games trade press
Cons
- - Scope is narrow: humanoid character animation from video only — no text-to-animation, no non-humanoid rigs, no facial or hand performance capture
- - Output is emote-grade motion: expressive for in-game use, but occlusions and props degrade pose reconstruction and cinematic polish still needs an animator
- - Anything beyond self-service (bespoke AI, co-development, dedicated management) is Enterprise sales, and the $1M fund is application-gated
- - The kinetix.video music-video product shares the brand but not the technology pipeline — a real source of procurement confusion
Polycam
Pros
- + LiDAR Space Mode produced an editable 2D floor plan with auto-labeled rooms within seconds of finishing a scan in my test of a two-bedroom flat
- + Export round-trips worked: layered DXF floor plans opened with scale and layers intact in a CAD viewer, and OBJ/USDZ meshes imported cleanly
- + Five capture modes (Object, Space, Floorplan, AI Capture, 360) cover objects, interiors and documentation in one app instead of three tools
- + Business tier allows up to 2,000 images and 30 minutes of video per capture — enough resolution in my mechanical-room test to reconstruct reflective pipework that smaller captures smeared
- + Free tier is usable for real experimentation: limited captures, GLTF export and public link sharing at $0
Cons
- - Floor plans and the measurement layer require a LiDAR device — the same scan on a non-LiDAR phone returned only a mesh in my testing
- - Basic's 300-image capture ceiling cut short my photogrammetry coverage of a display cabinet mid-capture
- - Measurement accuracy is undocumented against survey standards; fine for as-builts, not for contractual tolerances
- - Processing and floor-plan generation are server-side, so disconnected sites become a capture-now-process-later workflow
- - Subscription-only (the vendor pricing FAQ rules out one-time purchase), with floor plans, point clouds and shared libraries gated at Business ($400/year per user)
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Kinetix or Polycam?▼
Polycam scores higher at 4.0/5 vs 3.5/5 for Kinetix, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Kinetix and Polycam?▼
Kinetix: Kinetix generates realistic character animations using AI, enabling game developers to create motion sequences faster without manual rigging or keyframing. Polycam: Polycam captures 3D scans, floor plans and measurements using a phone camera or LiDAR, and exports them to CAD and BIM formats.
Is Kinetix or Polycam more affordable?▼
Kinetix starts at €0/mo, Polycam starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.