Hide My WP Ghost vs Tines
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Hide My WP Ghost and Tines.
🏆
Verdict: Tines wins
Tines scores 4.5/5, edging out Hide My WP Ghost at 3.9/5. Security, IT and operations teams that need auditable no-code automation across sensitive systems with human approval gates built in.
Hide My WP Ghost WordPress security plugin | Tines Workflow automation platform for security and operations teams | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 (1 review) | 4.5 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | free | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free | Free tier available |
| Best For | WordPress site owners, freelancers and small agencies who want to cut automated bot and login traffic by removing the WordPress fingerprint, and who already run or will add a separate malware-scanning layer. | Security, IT and operations teams that need auditable no-code automation across sensitive systems with human approval gates built in. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | — | free tierteam featuresapi access |
| Visit Tines → |
Hide My WP Ghost
Pros
- + The free Lite build is genuinely usable: on my test install I changed wp-login.php, randomized plugin names and turned on the 7G/8G firewall without paying anything (vendor counts 115-plus free features; 100K+ active installs on WordPress.org)
- + Path changes are virtual rewrite rules, not file moves — deactivating the plugin restored every original URL immediately in my test, which makes trialing it low-risk
- + Cheap against the category: $29/yr for one site at time of writing under the October Deal (list $49), versus the $149/yr Wordfence Premium and $229/yr Sucuri starting points the vendor cites, plus lifetime licences from $199
- + Frontend overhead is small — the MakeWPFast Docker benchmark measured +0 ms TTFB and +3 database queries (A- grade), matching the light footprint I saw
- + Ghost Doctor diagnoses broken rewrites (Nginx, locked config files) and auto-undoes repairs that don't help, addressing the plugin's main real-world failure mode
Cons
- - No malware scanner, file-integrity checks or cleanup — an existing infection passes through untouched, so it cannot be your only security layer
- - Ghost Mode broke asset loading on a page-builder test site until I added exclusions, and Nginx users must paste rewrite rules manually
- - Versions up to 7.0.11 carried an unauthenticated login CAPTCHA bypass (WPSEC-2026-0118, fixed in 7.0.12), and the Plugin Security Scorecard criticizes maybe_unserialize() use and weak exploit blocking in its regression suite
- - Country blocking, automated IP blocking, AI-crawler blocking, unlimited logs and the Login Page Designer are Premium-only
- - Branding and versioning are confusing (WP Ghost rename, two domains, free 7.0.x vs premium 9.0.x lines), and the pricing page contradicts itself on whether Ghost All covers unlimited sites or 1,000
Tines
Pros
- + Security-native design: credential isolation, immutable audit logs, SSO on the free tier and first-class approval gates — I verified approvals work as a primitive, not a webhook hack
- + A real phishing-response workflow (enrich, branch, Slack approval, ticket write-back) went live on the canvas in under an hour in my testing
- + G2 satisfaction is exceptional for the category: 4.8/5 from ~230 reviews with high-nineties scores on ease of use, setup and support quality
- + Vendor-agnostic by design — anything with an API connects, so you are not stranded by a curated connector marketplace
- + Strong company signals: $125M Series C at a $1.125B valuation (Feb 2025), 1B+ automated actions per week, and an AI-governance (3B) story ahead of rivals
Cons
- - No published pricing above the free tier — every production evaluation runs through sales, and the AWS Marketplace vehicle is a custom contract only
- - The free edition caps at 3 live workflows (and 25,000 monthly events under older terms) — enough to evaluate, not to operate
- - No code escape hatch: deep JSON reshaping and bespoke logic get tedious in event transforms where a JS node would be three lines
- - Tines 3B (self-healing, cross-org monitoring of externally built workflows) launched July 2026 and is young — validate hands-on before betting a governance program on it
- - Category identity is blurred (SOAR, iPaaS, process automation), and non-security use cases feel secondary to the alert-driven core
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Hide My WP Ghost or Tines?▼
Tines scores higher at 4.5/5 vs 3.9/5 for Hide My WP Ghost, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Hide My WP Ghost and Tines?▼
Hide My WP Ghost: Hide My WP Ghost is a WordPress security plugin that hides the standard WordPress paths and file names from automated attacks, and blocks brute force attempts. Tines: Tines is a workflow automation platform used by security and IT teams to build and run processes across sensitive systems without writing code.
Is Hide My WP Ghost or Tines more affordable?▼
Hide My WP Ghost pricing varies, Tines starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.