Glass Health vs Nabla
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Glass Health and Nabla.
🏆
Verdict: Nabla wins
Nabla scores 4.0/5, edging out Glass Health at 3.7/5. Individual clinicians, residents and small practices that want an ambient scribe they can evaluate free before any purchase, with a documented no-retention privacy posture.
Glass Health AI for clinical decision support | Nabla AI copilot for healthcare professionals | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.7 (1 review) | 4.0 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $99/mo |
| Best For | Physicians, residents and nurse practitioners who want cited differential reasoning and plan drafting alongside an ambient scribe — especially solo users comfortable with the terms, or practices willing to sign the BAA and buy Max for EHR integration. | Individual clinicians, residents and small practices that want an ambient scribe they can evaluate free before any purchase, with a documented no-retention privacy posture. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tier | — |
| Visit Glass Health → | Visit Nabla → |
Glass Health
Pros
- + Differential diagnosis with per-item reasoning and openable citations — in my testing it surfaced considerations I had missed, not paraphrases of my prompt
- + Real-time clinical prompts (follow-up questions, differential ideas) appeared mid-encounter while the note drafted in the background
- + Public pricing with a genuine free tier: $0 / $20 / $90 / $200 per month at time of writing, no sales call required
- + Independent evidence exists — two studies beating ChatGPT on defined tasks, plus the Harvard-Stanford ARISE NOHARM benchmark covered by Forbes (March 2026)
- + Specialty modes and 62+ scribing languages make it usable outside US-English primary care
Cons
- - Individual Terms of Service authorize training models on the patient data you enter and allow sale of de-identified data; the BAA is opt-in, not automatic
- - Lite and Starter are ad-supported — sponsorships appear inside a clinical tool
- - EHR integration (Athena, Epic, eCW, Elation) is Max-only at $200/month, gating the main workflow payoff
- - Usage caps on lower tiers are described only as "limited" or "standard" with no published numbers
- - No prospective patient-outcomes study; it is decision support, not a diagnostic device, and remains clinician-verified
Nabla
Pros
- + Genuine free tier — I generated and iterated notes on self-serve signup with no sales call, which almost no clinical AI rival offers
- + Note drafts arrived in under 30 seconds in my tests and respected my chosen template structure rather than transcript order
- + Privacy-first design: audio, transcripts and notes are not retained and patient data is not used for model training, backed by a public trust center (SOC 2 Type 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, GDPR)
- + Multilingual capture worked in my bilingual French/English test and produced one coherent English note
- + Independent credibility signals: TIME World's Top HealthTech 2026, 85,000+ clinicians and 130+ health organizations reported on nabla.com
Cons
- - No official price list at all — the widely cited ~$119/provider/month Pro figure is third-party-reported, not confirmed by Nabla
- - No diagnostic reasoning, order staging or revenue-cycle depth; coding support is narrower than Suki's HCC/CPT output
- - Free tier caps note volume (third parties report ~30 notes/month) and free users get community-level support only
- - EHR write-back, SSO and tailored models are Enterprise-only, so the workflow payoff needs a sales conversation
- - Ambient attribution slipped with overlapping speakers in my test, requiring manual correction of the draft
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Glass Health or Nabla?▼
Nabla scores higher at 4.0/5 vs 3.7/5 for Glass Health, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Glass Health and Nabla?▼
Glass Health: Glass Health is a clinical AI assistant for doctors and other clinicians, giving answers and decision support grounded in current medical evidence to help with diagnosis and patient care. Nabla: Nabla listens during patient consultations and drafts the clinical note and codes directly into Epic and other electronic health records.
Is Glass Health or Nabla more affordable?▼
Glass Health starts at €0/mo, Nabla starts at €99/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.