Devin vs CrewAI
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Devin and CrewAI.
🏆
Verdict: CrewAI wins
CrewAI scores 4.0/5, edging out Devin at 3.9/5. Python teams building role-based multi-agent workflows who want an open-source framework today and a governed platform path later.
Devin The first AI software engineer | CrewAI Multi-agent AI crews for complex tasks | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 (1 review) | 4.0 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | freemium |
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | Free tier available |
| Best For | Engineering teams with a well-groomed backlog who want to delegate complete, precisely-specified tasks to an autonomous agent and keep humans on review. | Python teams building role-based multi-agent workflows who want an open-source framework today and a governed platform path later. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | team features | open sourceapi access |
| Visit Devin → | Visit CrewAI → |
Devin
Pros
- + On well-specified tickets (flaky-test fix, CRUD endpoint with tests) it returned clean, convention-matching PRs I merged with light review — real time savings at $20/month
- + Sandboxed execution with test iteration is the difference from chat-based assistants: it validates its own work before opening the PR
- + Devin Review's free public-PR review at devinreview.com works without an account and is a useful standalone surface
- + Broad workflow integration — Slack, Teams, Linear, Jira, GitHub/GitLab/Bitbucket, MCP — plus automations for recurring tasks
- + Transparent plan ladder now ($0/$20/$200, Teams $80 minimum + $40/full seat) instead of the flat $500 launch price
Cons
- - Output quality tracks spec quality almost linearly: a vague refactor ticket produced an over-scoped PR I had to close and rewrite
- - Credit drift is real — automation runs and sandbox troubleshooting consume quota invisibly, and out-of-quota usage bills at API pricing
- - It implements bad tickets without pushback; review is mandatory for security-sensitive or migration work
- - Enterprise controls (VPC, SSO, dedicated support) are sales-gated, and the product surface is reshaping around the Windsurf acquisition
CrewAI
Pros
- + Role/goal/backstory abstraction produced clearly differentiated agent behaviour from one underlying model in my three-agent crew test
- + Export-as-MCP-server worked as documented — the crew came up as a tool server a coding agent could call
- + Tracing, OpenTelemetry export and Slack-based human-in-the-loop pauses made a recurring workflow operable
- + The open-source framework installs from PyPI and runs anywhere Python runs; no platform commitment required
- + Studio's AI copilot generated a working workflow skeleton from a plain-language description
Cons
- - Free tier is 50 workflow executions/month — a demo allowance, not a working quota
- - The $25/month Professional tier shown on archived pricing pages is gone; after free there is only a sales conversation
- - Token burn surprised me: a reviewer loop on a three-agent crew cost far more than a single-agent equivalent
- - Hierarchical delegation occasionally looped or duplicated work until I tightened task boundaries
- - SSO, RBAC and PII redaction are Enterprise-gated, so the free tier is unusable for sensitive data
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Devin or CrewAI?▼
CrewAI scores higher at 4.0/5 vs 3.9/5 for Devin, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Devin and CrewAI?▼
Devin: Devin is an autonomous coding agent from Cognition that plans work, writes and runs code and opens pull requests, working as a cloud agent alongside an engineering team. CrewAI: CrewAI is a framework and platform for orchestrating multi-agent AI systems, where several agents work as a crew on a shared task.
Is Devin or CrewAI more affordable?▼
Devin starts at €500/mo, CrewAI starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.