Dealfront vs Grain
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Dealfront and Grain.
🏆
Verdict: Grain wins
Grain scores 4.0/5, edging out Dealfront at 3.8/5. Sales and customer-facing teams of roughly 5-50 seats that want meeting capture, CRM-ready notes, and call coaching at published per-seat prices.
Dealfront B2B sales intelligence for Europe | Grain AI meeting recording and insights for sales | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 (1 review) | 4.0 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | European B2B sales and marketing teams that want GDPR-compliant visitor identification, prospecting data and activation in one platform with published pricing and no seat counting. | Sales and customer-facing teams of roughly 5-50 seats that want meeting capture, CRM-ready notes, and call coaching at published per-seat prices. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam featuresgdpr compliant | free tierteam features |
| Visit Dealfront → | Visit Grain → |
Dealfront
Pros
- + Published pricing with unlimited users and unlimited tracked domains on every tier — rare in sales intelligence
- + Free Lite tier is genuinely permanent (100 companies/month, 7-day history), not a trial in disguise
- + European company data is deeper than US-centric tools in my DACH/Nordics tests, with sensible legal-entity detail
- + Real-time identification and alerts were fast enough to act on — target-account visits triggered notifications within minutes
Cons
- - US contact depth trails American competitors; the gap showed first at the contact level on North American targets
- - Credit allowances on entry tiers (20/month at time of writing) run out fast with active enrichment or display use
- - Published prices require annual commitment — monthly billing costs noticeably more
- - Identification resolves companies, not individuals, so named-contact work depends entirely on the enrichment step
Grain
Pros
- + Bot-free desktop capture meant no notetaker robot to explain at the start of customer calls — the transcripts and AI notes held up in my checks
- + Transparent per-seat pricing from $15/mo (annual) with a usable free tier, against quote-only enterprise incumbents
- + Custom AI prompts let me steer summary shape to match our CRM hygiene process instead of accepting a generic template
- + MCP server on the platform (basic on Free, advanced on Business) let Claude query workspace meeting data directly
- + Trackers, deal boards, and AI coaching bring Gong-style call intelligence to a five-to-fifty-seat team at a fraction of the price
Cons
- - Recorder-seat rules on Free are contradictory in Grain's own docs (pricing page: unlimited notetaker seats; support article: one, plus a 20-bot-recording cap for personal emails)
- - Free tier walls are hard: 45-minute meetings, short history (30 days per the pricing page), and no uploads, CRM, or coaching
- - Starter caps uploads at 10/month and its 10-upload limit bites teams importing external recordings
- - All paid seats in a workspace must be on the same plan tier — no mixing Starter and Business to control costs
- - Thinner revenue intelligence than Gong-class tools: no predictive deal scoring or deep forecasting
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Dealfront or Grain?▼
Grain scores higher at 4.0/5 vs 3.8/5 for Dealfront, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Dealfront and Grain?▼
Dealfront: European B2B sales intelligence platform (merger of Leadfeeder and Echobot) with website visitor tracking and prospect data. Grain: Grain records, transcribes and summarises meetings, and clips the moments worth sharing into the CRM or a message.
Is Dealfront or Grain more affordable?▼
Dealfront starts at €0/mo, Grain starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.