Culture Amp vs Hirevue
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Culture Amp and Hirevue.
🏆
Verdict: Culture Amp wins
Culture Amp scores 4.2/5, edging out Hirevue at 4.0/5. People teams at 200+ employee companies who treat engagement measurement as a strategic, benchmarked discipline and want performance and development attached to the same data.
Culture Amp Employee feedback platform that turns survey data into actionable insights | Hirevue AI-powered video interviews for modern hiring | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.2 (1 review) | 4.0 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $5/mo | From $35000/mo |
| Best For | People teams at 200+ employee companies who treat engagement measurement as a strategic, benchmarked discipline and want performance and development attached to the same data. | Enterprise talent-acquisition teams running high-volume, structured hiring — hourly, campus, customer service, graduate pipelines — that need validated assessments and defensible governance. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | ssoteam features | team featuresssoapi access |
| Visit Culture Amp → | Visit Hirevue → |
Culture Amp
Pros
- + Survey methodology and question design are visibly stronger than generic pulse tools — items measure specific constructs rather than vibes
- + Benchmarking against external company data puts survey scores in context immediately, not just against your own last quarter
- + AI comment summaries condensed hundreds of open-text responses into themes matching my manual reading, with links back to source comments
- + AI Coach is included in every plan and its suggested manager actions were concrete conversation prompts, not platitudes
- + Service tiers scale sensibly — named Customer Success partner and implementation PM from the 200–999 band up
Cons
- - No list price, no free plan, no trial — every plan is quote-based and billed annually, so budgeting requires a sales call
- - Proprietary scoring concepts (Retention Insights, Performance Culture Quadrant) are not explained transparently on the pricing page
- - Not an HRIS: core records and payroll must live elsewhere and flow in via HRIS integrations
- - Under 200 employees gets only group Customer Success support, and the depth may exceed what a small team needs
- - Bespoke reporting cuts can feel constrained by the platform's own analysis framework
Hirevue
Pros
- + Deepest validated stack in the category: structured video interviews, game-based and skills assessments, and an AI Interviewer backed by published IO-psychology validation work
- + Enterprise governance is first-class — ATS/HRIS integrations, permissions, cheating/fraud audits, and SOC/ISO/FedRAMP security claims on the vendor site
- + 40+ language support for global candidate pools (per the vendor and People Managing People's review)
- + Review signals are consistent across surfaces: G2 4.1/5 (255 reviews), Capterra 4.5/5, Software Advice 4.5/5, with praise clustering on throughput and scheduling automation
- + The company removed facial analysis from its scoring in early 2020 on evidence grounds, and what remains (speech content and structured behavioral indicators) is more defensible than its reputation suggests
Cons
- - No public pricing and no self-serve tier — third-party estimates start around $25,000–$35,000/year, which excludes small teams
- - Asynchronous video interviews hurt completion rates among senior candidates and candidates with competing offers; the format fits high-volume roles best
- - BIPA biometric-consent litigation reached a $3.75M settlement in 2026 (class period 2017–2026), so the privacy tail is not purely historical
- - Fairness evidence is vendor-run: published audits show reduced adverse impact, but there is no independent validation or inspectable model card
- - Deep customization is a known weak spot in user reviews, and the new AI Interviewer voice-screening product sits in an area of fast-moving hiring-AI regulation
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Culture Amp or Hirevue?▼
Culture Amp scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 4.0/5 for Hirevue, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Culture Amp and Hirevue?▼
Culture Amp: Culture Amp collects employee engagement, performance and development feedback and turns the survey results into benchmarks and action plans for managers. Hirevue: AI-driven video interviewing platform that streamlines recruitment with automated candidate screening and global talent reach.
Is Culture Amp or Hirevue more affordable?▼
Culture Amp starts at €5/mo, Hirevue starts at €35000/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.