Count vs Aidoc
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Count and Aidoc.
🏆
Verdict: Aidoc wins
Aidoc scores 4.2/5, edging out Count at 3.8/5. Hospital radiology departments and integrated health systems with meaningful acute imaging volumes that want one governed platform for many FDA-cleared triage algorithms instead of a stack of point solutions.
Count Collaborative data analysis notebooks | Aidoc AI powered radiology image analysis platform | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.8 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | paid |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | From $10000/mo |
| Best For | Data teams whose colleagues act on AI-generated numbers and need every claim traced to a source before it reaches a decision. | Hospital radiology departments and integrated health systems with meaningful acute imaging volumes that want one governed platform for many FDA-cleared triage algorithms instead of a stack of point solutions. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tierteam features | api accessteam featuresgdpr compliant |
| Visit Count → | Visit Aidoc → |
Count
Pros
- + Citation labelling is real: in my tests, sourced claims showed their source, inferences were tagged as judgements, and an unsourced claim was flagged 'check needed' instead of being invented
- + Multiplayer canvas beats notebooks for concurrent work — three of us edited SQL, annotations and Python on one board with no lock conflicts
- + Per-editor pricing with free viewers keeps costs tied to producers, not audience
- + Live reports recompute from the warehouse rather than freezing snapshots, and automations push them on schedule
Cons
- - Free tier is a taste only: 3 canvases, 1 project, 1 database connection
- - Pro's 4GB compute cap on the Python VM and dataset extracts is awkward for wide extracts; 32GB requires Enterprise
- - 'Unlimited AI credits' is fair-use with an unpublished daily ceiling — get the number in writing before signing
- - Governed semantic layer with admin approvals is Enterprise-only, so mid-tier teams can still ship conflicting metric definitions
Aidoc
Pros
- + Widest FDA-cleared acute triage portfolio I have reviewed: 31 authorisations on the FDA's December 2025 list, plus the first multi-indication clearance covering 14 abdominal CT findings in one workflow
- + Multi-triage consolidation meaningfully reduces alert noise — one flagged study produces one stacked panel, not one pop-up per algorithm
- + Real-world deployment evidence: Mercy Health documented urgent case turnaround falling from 19.8h to 1.3h across 50+ hospitals, with 5,642 patients expedited from 50,749 flagged findings
- + Vendor-neutral aiOS layer lets a health system run third-party and Aidoc algorithms through one governance and notification stack (17 FDA-cleared algorithms deployed at Hartford HealthCare)
- + Care Coordination and Patient Management close the loop beyond triage: mobile alerts with image context, and report mining that routes incidental findings to facility-defined follow-up protocols
Cons
- - No public pricing, no trial, no free tier — third-party estimates of ~$50k/site/year baseline with $8k-$15k per extra module are unverifiable until you are deep in a sales process
- - Hospital-only: requires PACS/RIS/EHR integration work, so it is irrelevant to individual clinicians, small practices and low-volume facilities
- - 510(k) clearance for most modules does not itself require independent clinical performance data (per JAMA Network Open) — buyers should demand the study set, not just the clearance count
- - No public changelog for algorithm updates, which is a real gap for a system whose output feeds clinical decisions
- - Vendor performance figures (order-of-magnitude false-alert reduction, 1,600+ hospitals) are company claims I could not independently audit
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Count or Aidoc?▼
Aidoc scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 3.8/5 for Count, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Count and Aidoc?▼
Count: Count is a collaborative canvas for data analysis, combining SQL, Python and charts in a notebook several people can work in at once. Aidoc: Aidoc analyses medical imaging to flag urgent findings for radiologists and care teams, prioritising the cases that need attention first.
Is Count or Aidoc more affordable?▼
Count starts at €0/mo, Aidoc starts at €10000/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.