Cleanvoice AI vs Krisp
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Cleanvoice AI and Krisp.
🏆
Verdict: Krisp wins
Krisp scores 4.2/5, edging out Cleanvoice AI at 4.0/5. Remote workers and call-heavy teams in noisy environments who want app-agnostic clean audio plus a bot-free meeting record from one install.
Cleanvoice AI Remove filler words and silences automatically | Krisp AI noise cancellation for any call | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | freemium | freemium |
| Starting Price | Free tier available | Free tier available |
| Best For | Podcasters and video creators whose post-production pain is filler words, mouth sounds and dead air rather than editing craft. | Remote workers and call-heavy teams in noisy environments who want app-agnostic clean audio plus a bot-free meeting record from one install. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tier | free tiermobile app |
| Visit Cleanvoice AI → | Visit Krisp → |
Cleanvoice AI
Pros
- + Room-tone gap fill made removals inaudible in my 42-minute test — I could not locate edit points without the marker list
- + Timeline export to Audition, Premiere, DaVinci Resolve, Reaper, Audacity or .EDL let me restore two over-eager cuts in about three minutes
- + Cost per episode is trivial: roughly $0.77 of processing for a 42-minute episode at the $11/10-hour tier in my test
- + Multitrack uploads noticeably reduced false-positive cuts versus single-track stereo in my comparison
- + Unused subscription hours roll over up to 3x the plan limit and pay-as-you-go credits stay valid two years
Cons
- - No free plan — only a 30-minute trial; default filler sensitivity took two intentional rhetorical pauses in my test
- - Files are deleted 7 days after processing, so you cannot leave exports sitting
- - No shared team workspace on any plan, which limits agency workflows
- - Not a creative editor — no music, arrangement or text-based content editing
- - Heavy accents and severely noisy or overlapping speech still need manual cleanup, per user reports and my own noisy test file
Krisp
Pros
- + Two-way noise cancellation held up against a mechanical keyboard and street noise in my test — far side reported clean audio
- + Works under Zoom, Teams, Meet, Discord and phone calls as a virtual device with no meeting bot
- + On-device processing for noise cancellation; fully private on-device transcription at Enterprise tier (krisp.ai/pricing)
- + Core at $8/user/month billed annually includes unlimited noise cancellation and an unlimited bot-free note-taker
- + MCP integration (Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, custom) makes meeting data queryable from AI clients
Cons
- - No ongoing free plan — a 7-day trial only, then $8-16/user/month depending on billing (krisp.ai/pricing, Scribbl)
- - 8-12% CPU during active calls in my testing — noticeable on older hardware alongside video and screenshare
- - Action-item extraction produced generic entries without owners or dates in my sessions
- - Storage caps of 10GB (Core) / 60GB (Advanced) will bind heavy recorders
- - Accent conversion (1 hr/day on Core) is technically impressive but ethically loaded — enable it deliberately
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Cleanvoice AI or Krisp?▼
Krisp scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 4.0/5 for Cleanvoice AI, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Cleanvoice AI and Krisp?▼
Cleanvoice AI: Cleanvoice removes filler words, mouth sounds, long silences and background noise from podcast and video recordings automatically. Krisp: Krisp removes background noise and echo from calls and takes AI meeting notes. It works as a layer under any conferencing or calling software.
Is Cleanvoice AI or Krisp more affordable?▼
Cleanvoice AI starts at €0/mo, Krisp starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.