Clay vs n8n

A detailed comparison to help you choose between Clay and n8n.

🏆

Verdict: n8n wins

n8n scores 4.3/5, edging out Clay at 3.9/5. Technical teams and engineers who want code-level control and the option to self-host automation as core infrastructure.

Clay

Clay

AI-powered data enrichment and outreach

n8n

n8n

Workflow automation that gives you control

Rating3.9 (1 review)4.3 (1 review)
Pricing Modelfreemiumfreemium
Starting PriceFree tier availableFree tier available
Best ForGTM engineers and outbound teams who will pay for data quality and want one workbench for enrichment, signals, research, and campaign prep.Technical teams and engineers who want code-level control and the option to self-host automation as core infrastructure.
Free Tier
API Access
Team Features
Open Source
Tags
free tierteam features
open sourcefree tierapi access
Visit Clay →Visit n8n →

Clay

Pros

  • + Waterfall enrichment cut my blended per-contact cost roughly in half versus single-provider lookup (71% email coverage on 500 companies across three providers)
  • + Two-meter pricing (Data Credits + Actions) is clearer than the old unified credit; Clay claims marketplace data prices dropped 50–90% in the redesign
  • + 200+ data providers in one contract replaces a stack of separate enrichment subscriptions
  • + Claygent research answered structured questions with source URLs on most rows in my test — useful when staged behind cheaper filters
  • + Financially credible and shipping fast: $115M Series D at $7.1B valuation (clay.com/blog/series-d), 17k+ customers claimed

Cons

  • - Real entry price is $185/mo (Launch) plus credit burn — the legacy $149 Starter figure floating around aggregators is outdated
  • - Waterfall ordering is unforgiving: putting an expensive provider first tripled my credit burn for 5% more coverage in one test
  • - Generalist automation is out of scope — no arbitrary SaaS triggers, no self-hosting; GTM data motions only
  • - Some Series D "self-learning revenue engine" claims are roadmap, not what ships today; treat the agent story as vendor vision
  • - Email accuracy still depends on underlying providers — I saw mid-single-digit bounce rates on best-effort results and ran downstream validation
View full Clayreview →

n8n

Pros

  • + Unlimited steps per execution: my 20-node nightly sync counted as one execution, so complexity stops driving cost (n8n.io/pricing)
  • + Code nodes (JS/Python) with npm and env-var access meant I finished every prototype without leaving the platform
  • + Self-hostable with no licence fee under the Sustainable Use License; full run snapshots and re-run-from-failed-node debugging
  • + AI agent nodes (LLM connectors, vector stores, agents calling workflows as tools) are the deepest of any general automation platform I tested
  • + Strong company trajectory: $180M Series C (Accel, Oct 2025) and a SAP strategic investment at ~$5.2B in May 2026

Cons

  • - Not open source — the Sustainable Use License (fair-code) forbids offering n8n as a hosted service and fails OSI procurement checks
  • - Assumes engineering literacy: JSON paths, expressions, and async data structures stumped every ops-only user I watched try it
  • - Self-hosting carries real ops cost — queue mode, worker scaling and upgrades took me hours that a managed platform absorbs
  • - Documentation is thin at the edges; AI node options and queue-mode config sent me to community forum threads
  • - Business cloud tier is self-hosted-only at time of writing (cloud waitlisted), leaving a gap between Pro's 10K executions and Enterprise
View full n8nreview →

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better, Clay or n8n?▼
n8n scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 3.9/5 for Clay, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Clay and n8n?▼
Clay: Clay is a sales and marketing data platform that pulls contact and company data from 200+ providers, enriches it with AI agents, and powers targeted outreach for go-to-market teams. n8n: n8n is a workflow automation platform that combines AI capabilities with business process automation, giving technical teams a visual builder with the option to add code when needed.
Is Clay or n8n more affordable?▼
Clay starts at €0/mo, n8n starts at €0/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.

Stay in the loop

Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.

No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.