Checkmarx AI vs Orca Security
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Checkmarx AI and Orca Security.
🏆
Verdict: Orca Security wins
Orca Security scores 4.2/5, edging out Checkmarx AI at 3.9/5. Cloud security teams at mid-market to enterprise scale that want comprehensive multi-cloud visibility and risk ranking without deploying agents on production workloads.
Checkmarx AI AI application security testing | Orca Security Agentless AI cloud security | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 (1 review) | 4.2 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $500/mo |
| Best For | Enterprise DevSecOps and AppSec teams consolidating multiple security-testing vendors into one policy engine, with budget for a negotiated platform contract. | Cloud security teams at mid-market to enterprise scale that want comprehensive multi-cloud visibility and risk ranking without deploying agents on production workloads. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | ssoteam featuresapi access | ssoteam features |
| Visit Checkmarx AI → | Visit Orca Security → |
Checkmarx AI
Pros
- + Nine-plus scanners (SAST, SCA, DAST, API, IaC, container, secrets, malicious packages, ASPM) correlated under one risk model and one developer workflow
- + Mature SAST engine with broad language coverage, now with real-time IDE scanning that shortens the fix loop in my testing
- + AI remediation proposes concrete fixes (parameterised queries, dependency bumps) and AI noise reduction makes early SAST output usable
- + Commercial momentum is verifiable: $150M+ ARR announced October 2025, Leader in IDC MarketScape for ASPM 2025
Cons
- - Quote-only pricing with no self-serve tier; Vendr's median contract is around $60,950 and onboarding assumes a dedicated AppSec owner
- - Heavy configuration burden — poorly tuned deployments produce noise, and the first month is calibration
- - Individual scanners trail focused specialists (Snyk for SCA, Semgrep for SAST) on their own dimensions
- - ASPM depth is still absorbing the acquired Tromzo technology, so some correlation features are newer than the packaging implies
Orca Security
Pros
- + True agentless Side-Scanning: full cloud inventory from read-only snapshot access in my trial without installing anything on production workloads
- + Unified Data Model chains exposure, vulnerability, identity and data context so the risk queue is ranked by blast radius rather than raw CVSS
- + Published AWS Marketplace pack pricing ($7,000/$12,000/$17,000/$30,000 per month) gives buyers a real negotiating anchor and counts toward AWS spend commitments
- + Consistent satisfaction signals: 4.6/5 on Gartner Peer Insights and G2, 4.8/5 on Capterra per Orca's reviews page
Cons
- - No low-cost entry point — the marketplace floor is $7,000 per month and direct sales is quote-only, excluding startups and small teams
- - Snapshot-based scanning is periodic; real-time runtime detection is shallower than agent-bearing competitors
- - Risk prioritisation can be opaque when a finding is deprioritised, which matters in audit-driven environments
- - Cloud-only coverage — substantial on-prem estates need a separate tool
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Checkmarx AI or Orca Security?▼
Orca Security scores higher at 4.2/5 vs 3.9/5 for Checkmarx AI, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Checkmarx AI and Orca Security?▼
Checkmarx AI: Checkmarx is an application security platform that scans code and runtime for vulnerabilities, using AI agents to triage and fix findings. Orca Security: Agentless cloud security platform that uses AI to detect risks, vulnerabilities, and misconfigurations without installing agents.
Is Checkmarx AI or Orca Security more affordable?▼
Checkmarx AI starts at €500/mo, Orca Security starts at €500/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.