Checkmarx AI vs Abnormal AI
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Checkmarx AI and Abnormal AI.
🏆
Verdict: Abnormal AI wins
Abnormal AI scores 4.3/5, edging out Checkmarx AI at 3.9/5. Enterprise security teams on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace whose top risk is BEC, account takeover and vendor fraud rather than malware, and who can budget for quote-based pricing.
Checkmarx AI AI application security testing | Abnormal AI AI-powered email security that stops advanced threats before they land | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.9 (1 review) | 4.3 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | paid | paid |
| Starting Price | From $500/mo | From $300/mo |
| Best For | Enterprise DevSecOps and AppSec teams consolidating multiple security-testing vendors into one policy engine, with budget for a negotiated platform contract. | Enterprise security teams on Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace whose top risk is BEC, account takeover and vendor fraud rather than malware, and who can budget for quote-based pricing. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | ssoteam featuresapi access | ssoteam features |
| Visit Checkmarx AI → | Visit Abnormal AI → |
Checkmarx AI
Pros
- + Nine-plus scanners (SAST, SCA, DAST, API, IaC, container, secrets, malicious packages, ASPM) correlated under one risk model and one developer workflow
- + Mature SAST engine with broad language coverage, now with real-time IDE scanning that shortens the fix loop in my testing
- + AI remediation proposes concrete fixes (parameterised queries, dependency bumps) and AI noise reduction makes early SAST output usable
- + Commercial momentum is verifiable: $150M+ ARR announced October 2025, Leader in IDC MarketScape for ASPM 2025
Cons
- - Quote-only pricing with no self-serve tier; Vendr's median contract is around $60,950 and onboarding assumes a dedicated AppSec owner
- - Heavy configuration burden — poorly tuned deployments produce noise, and the first month is calibration
- - Individual scanners trail focused specialists (Snyk for SCA, Semgrep for SAST) on their own dimensions
- - ASPM depth is still absorbing the acquired Tromzo technology, so some correlation features are newer than the packaging implies
Abnormal AI
Pros
- + False-positive rate is the lowest I have observed in email security — quarantine trust is achievable, which changes how teams work
- + API deployment into Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace in minutes with no MX or mail-flow changes
- + Incident forensics give relationship context and remediation in one view — I watched analysts close BEC tickets without a second tool
- + Two consecutive Gartner Magic Quadrant Leader placements for Email Security (2024, 2025) plus Forrester Wave Leader (Q2 2025)
Cons
- - No published pricing — quote-only per-user contracts that scale with headcount, with third-party medians in the $40K+/year range
- - Not a gateway: no attachment detonation at delivery time and limited value for hybrid/on-prem mail flows
- - The expanding AI-governance surface is wider than most small security teams can adopt at once
- - Slow-burn social engineering inside normal relationship patterns is the methodology's inherent blind spot
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Checkmarx AI or Abnormal AI?▼
Abnormal AI scores higher at 4.3/5 vs 3.9/5 for Checkmarx AI, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Checkmarx AI and Abnormal AI?▼
Checkmarx AI: Checkmarx is an application security platform that scans code and runtime for vulnerabilities, using AI agents to triage and fix findings. Abnormal AI: Abnormal AI is a behavioral AI security platform that protects email, identity and AI tools from phishing, account takeover and insider threats for security teams at organizations.
Is Checkmarx AI or Abnormal AI more affordable?▼
Checkmarx AI starts at €500/mo, Abnormal AI starts at €300/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.