Bing Image Creator vs Midjourney
A detailed comparison to help you choose between Bing Image Creator and Midjourney.
🏆
Verdict: Midjourney wins
Midjourney scores 4.5/5, edging out Bing Image Creator at 3.6/5. Designers, illustrators and creative teams whose first priority is the aesthetic quality of the image itself and who can work without an API.
Bing Image Creator Free AI image generation by Microsoft | Midjourney The gold standard of AI image generation | |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 3.6 (1 review) | 4.5 (1 review) |
| Pricing Model | free | paid |
| Starting Price | Free | From $10/mo |
| Best For | Anyone who wants high-quality AI images at zero cost for personal, educational or exploratory work and can live with strict content filters and limited control. | Designers, illustrators and creative teams whose first priority is the aesthetic quality of the image itself and who can work without an API. |
| Free Tier | ||
| API Access | ||
| Team Features | ||
| Open Source | ||
| Tags | free tier | — |
| Visit Bing Image Creator → | Visit Midjourney → |
Bing Image Creator
Pros
- + Zero-cost generation with unlimited standard-speed output after the 15 daily boosts — the best free image quality I have tested
- + Text-in-image rendering came out correct in most of my four-variation sets, a historic weakness of free generators
- + Multiple entry points (web, Bing, Edge sidebar, Copilot, Designer) make it reachable from where you already work
- + Model lineup has quietly grown: DALL·E 3, GPT-4o image generation and Microsoft's MAI-Image-1
- + Optional Copilot Pro at $20/month scales to 100 boosts/day without leaving the free product behind
Cons
- - Content filtering refused roughly one in five of my test prompts across ordinary subject matter
- - Minimal creative control: no model selection, no seeds, little aspect-ratio control, mostly 1024×1024 output
- - No API or batch generation — unusable as a production pipeline component
- - Commercial-use terms are restrictive and murky; verify current Bing terms before paid use
- - Limits and boost accounting are documented inconsistently across sources and can change without notice
Midjourney
Pros
- + V8.1 output led my test battery on lighting coherence, composition and short-text rendering
- + Unlimited Relax Mode on Standard (US$30/month) meant my workflow never hard-stopped when Fast hours ran out
- + Edit model accepted up to four reference images and held character identity across outfit changes in my testing
- + Bootstrapped and profitable with an estimated US$500M 2025 revenue — no investor pressure driving pricing churn
- + Style references, moodboards and personalization give repeatable control over look across a project
Cons
- - No free tier and no free trial — US$10/month is the only way in
- - No public API at all; nothing programmatic is officially supported
- - Stealth Mode (private generations) costs US$60/month; everything below Pro is public gallery material
- - Long passages of in-image text still garble where Ideogram stays accurate
- - Support is Discord-and-community based: no SLA, no SSO, no enterprise paperwork
Frequently Asked Questions
Which is better, Bing Image Creator or Midjourney?▼
Midjourney scores higher at 4.5/5 vs 3.6/5 for Bing Image Creator, making it the better-rated option in our comparison.
What is the difference between Bing Image Creator and Midjourney?▼
Bing Image Creator: Bing Image Creator is Microsoft's free text-to-image generator, built into Bing and Copilot, which turns a written prompt into images you can refine and keep in a collection. Midjourney: AI image and video generator used through the midjourney.com web app (Discord optional). Plans from $10/mo; no free tier or trial.
Is Bing Image Creator or Midjourney more affordable?▼
Bing Image Creator starts at €0/mo, Midjourney starts at €10/mo. Check the comparison table above for current pricing.
Stay in the loop
Get weekly updates on the best new AI tools, deals, and comparisons.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.